12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the District Court to enforce a suspended sentence for a longer period has been<br />

conditionallyextended byOrder 25 Rules 3 and4 which provides:<br />

294<br />

Issue of Warrants in execution of Court Orders<br />

Rule 3: Where the Court, upon imposing a sentence of imprisonment,<br />

conditionally suspends the execution thereof, it may, upon the application of the<br />

prosecution issue a Warrant of Committal on being satisfied of the failure of the<br />

accusedto complywith the terms upon which the saidsentence was suspended.<br />

Rule 4: Where by order, the execution of a sentence of imprisonment has been<br />

conditionallysuspended; no Warrant shall be issued to enforce such sentence, later<br />

than six months from the expiration of the time fixed by the said order for the<br />

performance of the condition. (District Court Rules 1997). 119<br />

This Rule has been interpreted by the Judges of the District Court as extending the time<br />

allowed for the activation of the penaltyto include the operative period and a period of six<br />

months thereafter, provided the sentence is suspended subject to the fulfilment of a<br />

condition. In other words, if the District Court imposes a conditional sentence of six<br />

months imprisonment and then suspends the penalty whether by a recognisance or<br />

otherwise, on condition that the offender does not receive a further conviction within two<br />

years, Order 25 Rule 4 allows the District Court to activate the sentence at anytime for the<br />

period of the suspension, in this case two years plus a period of six months thereafter<br />

allowedunder the Rule.<br />

Thus, the six month time limit imposed upon the activation of the District Court<br />

suspended sentence may be avoided provided the court specifies precisely the period for<br />

the fulfilment of the condition. The District Court has jurisdiction to impose consecutive<br />

custodial sentences to a maximumof 24 months. 120<br />

119 Osborough (1982:255) has observed that this rule in respect of the 1948 District Court Rules, while ostensibly a procedural rule set out in secondary<br />

legislation, may import aspects of substantive or primary law. The making of substantive lawwithin a rules making committee would be ultra vires their<br />

powers which are limited to prescribe onlyrules of practice andprocedure. As noted, the limitingprovisions of six months on the issuance of a Warrant may<br />

be avoided under the 1997 District Court Rules provided the suspended sentence is made subject to the fulfilment of that condition which will endure for the<br />

entiretyof the periodof suspension.<br />

120 Criminal Justice Act, 1951, Section 5 as amendedbyCriminal Justice Act, 1984, Section 12(2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!