12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 110 provides:<br />

1) Where a court orders a child to paya fine, costs or compensation and the child is<br />

in default-<br />

(a) the court shall not order that the child be detained in anycase where, if<br />

the child were a person of full age and capacity, he or she would be<br />

liable to be committed to prison, and<br />

(b) in lieu of such an order, the court may make one or more than one of<br />

the followingorders:<br />

(i) in the case of a fine, an order reducing its amount,<br />

(ii) an order allowing time, or further time, for payment of a fine, costs<br />

or compensation,<br />

(iii) an order imposing a community sanction appropriate to the age of<br />

the child.<br />

Accordingly, communityservice orders can nowbe made where there is a findingthat a sixteen<br />

or seventeen year old is in default in payment of a fine. It couldbe arguedthat the<br />

sanction for non-payment of fines byadults is a custodial sentence andaccordinglythe use<br />

of a communityservice order in lieu of a fine or as a penaltyfor the non-payment of a fine<br />

meets the policyobjectives of usingcommunityservice orders onlywhere custodyis in<br />

immediate contemplation bythe sentencer. Section 110 imposes an obligation upon the<br />

prosecution to bring separate breach proceedings for non-payment of the fine in addition<br />

to the original criminal proceedings relating to the issue of guilt andthe initial sentence.<br />

Accordingly, this necessitates entirelynewproceedings for non-payment of the fine by<br />

childoffenders sentenced to such penalty, a procedure which does not exist andis not<br />

necessaryfor fine penalties for adult offenders, as the fine penaltyfor adults contains<br />

within the order itself a period for payment and the specifiedperiodof imprisonment in<br />

default of payment of such fine. For example, a fine for careless driving under Section 52<br />

of the Road Traffic Act 1961 might readin respect of an adult offender: “a fine of two<br />

hundredandfiftyeuros, ninetydays to pay, fifteen days imprisonment in default”.<br />

However section 110 which deals with default in payment of a fine, costs or compensation<br />

requires an entirelynewproceedingin addition to the criminal trial or plea of guiltywhich<br />

precededthe making of the fine penaltyin respect of the childoffender, (Shannon<br />

2005:414). The necessityto bringsuch proceedings in cases of default of payment of fines<br />

practicallyguarantees that fines will not be collected havingregard to the experience in<br />

relation to the collection of fines generallyfor adult offenders where no extra proceedings<br />

are requiredandwhere the attrition rate in respect of the collection of such fines is<br />

extremelyhigh and known to be so, bysentencers (Comptroller and Auditor General 2000,<br />

Report No. 37:34). However, it is nowpossible for a court to impose a community<br />

service order on findinga sixteen or seventeen year oldin default in payment of a fine,<br />

which was not allowable under the 1983 Act. It couldon the one hand be arguedthat the<br />

imposition of a communityservice order for the non-payment of a fine is less stringent or<br />

punitive than incarceration. However, the minimum periodof hours under a community<br />

service order is 40 hours (Section 3(2) Criminal Justice (CommunityService) Act, 1983).<br />

If one applies the principle of equivalence with two hundredand fortyhours (maximum)<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!