12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

administration of the community service order in Ireland by the Probation Service may<br />

give rise to greater use of the sanction. However this may not translate into a consistent<br />

approach among the sentencers themselves when dealingwith breaches.<br />

The arrival of the national standards also had a transforming effect on the role of<br />

probation officers and their relationship with clients. Standards imposed by the Home<br />

Office upon the Probation Service, through the national standards, added significantly to<br />

the original controlling function which the Probation Service adopted when they first<br />

began administering community service in 1973 (Nellis 2004). Over the years that<br />

followed the Probation Service could be seen to shift from the traditional role of social<br />

worker, with all the discretionarypractices used within that paradigm to the wider function<br />

of supervisor within the criminal justice system which in part included the social work role.<br />

No longer would the function to advise, assist and befriend solely define the probation<br />

officer. The service was to move to a more conflicting role of enforcing court orders of<br />

communityservice perhaps changing forever the perception of the probation officer as the<br />

offender’s friend.<br />

However, the most significant result of this concerted policy of breaching non-compliant<br />

offenders was the increase in the number of offenders who might receive a custodial<br />

sentence upon being breached (Pease 1980:33-38). This increase in the custodial<br />

population might be considered an unnecessaryincarceration of a cohort of offenders who<br />

might in the first instance not have receiveda custodial sentence (Sparks 1971:398).<br />

COMMUNITY SERVICE AN EVERYDAY PENALTY<br />

Before considering the introduction and use of community service in the Republic of<br />

Ireland in Chapter 3, the emergence of community service as a mainstream penalty in<br />

EnglandandWales was discussedin this chapter and the previous chapter in order to more<br />

fully understand the sanction itself and the sense of expectancy which preceded its<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!