12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of a breach of a condition. This is no longer permissible under the District Court Rules,<br />

1997 and clearly the dicta from such cases as Brennan (supra) and in re Pratt (supra) would<br />

render proceeding in the absence of the accused or at least without notice to the accused,<br />

in any application for revocation of a suspended sentence, a procedure of questionable<br />

validity.<br />

Despite the absence of written rules of court providing for an application for the activation<br />

of a suspended sentence in the Circuit, Central and Special Criminal Court, the basic<br />

requirements for a valid breach application have been set down in a series of cases. In<br />

Judicial Review proceedings, Michael Rooney Dignam –v- His Honour Judge Raymond<br />

Groarke and the Director of Public Prosecutions (J. R. IEHC 150, 17 th November, 2000),<br />

the applicant was released “into the custodyof the Probation Service on condition that the<br />

applicant keep the peace and be of good behaviour for a period of two years”. The<br />

applicant was sentenced to four years imprisonment on the 17 th of November, 1998. The<br />

case was reviewed by the first named respondent on the 13 th of July, 1999 whereupon the<br />

balance of the sentence was suspended as set out above. The second named respondent<br />

applied ex parte to have the case re-entered on the 28 th of September, 1999 on the grounds<br />

that the applicant had failed to comply with the conditions of his release, namely to keep<br />

the peace and to be of good behaviour. The matter was re-entered on notice to the<br />

applicant’s Solicitor who appeared with counsel on the 8 th of October, 1999 and the first<br />

named respondent ordered that the applicant should serve the balance of the four years<br />

imposed upon him. The review court enquired into a number of issues, particularly the<br />

interpretation of the phrase “to keep the peace and be of good behaviour” and the nature<br />

of the proceedings before the first named respondent on the 8 th of October, 1999.<br />

McCracken J. in dealingwith the issues stated:<br />

“With regard to the second issue, the phrase “keep the peace and be of good<br />

behaviour” is one that has been in use for centuries. However, it does not seemto<br />

be a phrase which has attracted any statutory or judicial interpretation, perhaps<br />

because it means what it says. Mr. Mill-Arden S.C. on behalf of the applicant has<br />

strenuously argued that if the applicant is to be shown to be in breach of his<br />

condition, it must be shown that in some way he had not complied with the lawof<br />

the State and further that he had been convicted of a breach of the law before the<br />

matter could be re-entered before the Judge who suspended the sentence. In my<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!