12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sentences in the future. One expects however that the statutory suspended sentence<br />

under Section 99 will emerge over time as the dominant disposition as sentencers recognise<br />

the more advantageous enforcement mechanisms containedin the statutorysentence.<br />

A particular aspect of the statutory suspended sentence under Section 99, which will<br />

undoubtedly find favour among the judiciary, is the automatic re-entry of the suspended<br />

sentence before the sentencing court upon a further conviction of the accused where the<br />

original sentencing court may exercise its discretion to revoke or not to revoke the<br />

suspension. However, it mayprove difficult to tell themapart when the court is exercising<br />

its jurisdiction to suspend a sentence under the common lawor statutoryprocedures unless<br />

the recognisance used specifically refers to Section 99 of the Criminal Justice Act, 2006 as<br />

the operating jurisdiction. If the court utilises a suspended sentence which is not in strict<br />

compliance with Section 99, for example without using a bond, it is argued such a<br />

suspended sentence will be permissible as a common law type suspended sentence, but<br />

would clearly offend against the statutory suspended sentence under Section 99(1). One<br />

can expect such anomalies to arise if the two procedures are used simultaneously or<br />

interchangeably. 161<br />

If uncertainty is to result from the mixed use of the two procedures constitutional issues<br />

may arise under Article 38 of the Constitution which require certainty and due course of<br />

law.<br />

In summary, it has been argued in the preceding paragraphs that the introduction of a<br />

statutory replacement for a common lawprovision, whether as an offence, a rule of lawor<br />

a common law jurisdiction or power such as the jurisdiction to suspend a sentence of<br />

imprisonment, will not displace the former common law provision unless there is an<br />

express provision declaring the abolition of the provision in the statute. As a result, the<br />

powers of the criminal courts in Ireland to suspend a sentence of imprisonment will<br />

survive and will continue to co-exist alongside the new statutory arrangements for the<br />

suspension of sentences. Moreover, any organic practices especially in relation to the<br />

making of the suspended sentence at common law, together with the rules of procedure<br />

161 When making a suspended sentence, a judge maynot state explicitlywhich type of suspended sentence s/he is utilising. It maybe possible to discern which jurisdiction was utilised<br />

once the sentence has been made however. For example, if no bond was used, then the statute has not been complied with (Section 99(1)) but the sentence would nonetheless<br />

conformwith the common lawsuspendedsentence if the accusedverballygave his/her wordto the court to be of goodbehaviour andto come up for sentencingif calledupon to do<br />

so. The latter procedure is notedbythe court registrar on the court file.<br />

363

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!