12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which would answer the quite often conflicting rationales of sentencing and modalities of<br />

sentencing practice. It must equally be recognised that sentencing demands are not static<br />

but shift sometimes gradually over time depending on social, economic and political<br />

exigencies and at other times shift quite dynamically especially during periods of rapid<br />

social and economic change. In particular the rise in the crime-rate, despite the anticipated<br />

moderation, if not decline, in crime expected from the application of the welfare state<br />

programmes to the perceived causes of crime gave rise to a public fear, not unaided bythe<br />

media and in particular the popular press (Cohen 1959), that sentencing was losing its<br />

deterrent effect andsocietywas less well protected(Young1979:4-5).<br />

This public perception of the misapplication of sentencing further eroded confidence in<br />

existing non-custodial measures and presented an opportunity to introduce a newmeasure<br />

with a higher element of tariff of sentence to be performed in the community and for the<br />

benefit of the community, but a sentence notwithstanding, more demanding of the<br />

convictedoffender than heretofore.<br />

The addition of the element of bite in the sentence empowered the legislators to introduce<br />

the necessary legislation with a fair political wind behind them and with minimal rancour.<br />

By presenting the new sanction in this way, the politicians, charged with enacting<br />

legislation, reflected public acceptance or rejection of such proposals (Cohen 1973:90).<br />

Before discussing in detail the philosophical bases of the sentence of community service it<br />

is worth reflecting upon Young’s instruction not to confuse the aims of the sentence with<br />

its function:<br />

In discussing the penal philosophy of a sentence, a distinction must be drawn at the<br />

outset between the purposes for which a Court imposes a sentence and the way in<br />

which the sentence is construed bythe offender. It is often argued or assumed that<br />

any sentence that is experienced as unpleasant by an individual upon whom it is<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!