12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Irish Probation Service was completely underdeveloped before 1970, as previously<br />

noted, with no Probation Officer outside of Dublin (Kilcommins et al 2004: 52). Crucially,<br />

the sentencing aims expounded by the Court of Criminal Appeal in O’Driscoll, while<br />

expressing clearly what the object of sentencing might be, failed to identify a suitable<br />

vehicle within the penal system to facilitate the redemption or rehabilitation of the<br />

offender. If the Court of Criminal Appeal intended the use of the term “redeem” in a<br />

purelyreligious sense the prison service did provide the chaplaincyservice which in certain<br />

individual cases may have achieved the desired change in the offender. However, for the<br />

prison population as a whole the high rates of recidivism would appear to suggest that the<br />

desired incidence of redemption in offenders as envisaged bythe Court of Criminal Appeal<br />

didnot come about.<br />

If the term redeem as used by the Court of Criminal Appeal was intended to mean a<br />

facilitated rehabilitation through an agency of the State such as the Prison Service then the<br />

Courts were effectively asked to sentence in a vacuum by reference to facilities or<br />

programmes which did not exist. As previously mentioned the effectiveness of a fine is<br />

negated by the non-collection of that fine and indeed the knowledge by an offender that a<br />

fine is unlikely to be collected at all. Young suggests it only makes sense to discuss the<br />

philosophical bases of a sentence in terms of the aims for which it is imposed (Young<br />

1979; 34). The stated aim of imprisonment in the Report on Prisons and Places of<br />

Detention (1981) as mentioned was “to contain offenders”. This in many respects runs<br />

counter to the stated aim of sentencing by the Court of Criminal Appeal in O’Driscoll to<br />

allowthe accuseda chance of redemption. 31<br />

Internationally, the rehabilitative function of the prison was under critical challenge since<br />

the mid-1970s particularly the use of rehabilitative programmes for prisoners with<br />

indeterminate sentences (Martinson 1974). In the U.K., the Report on the Prison Service<br />

(1979) states that the purpose of imprisonment was to provide a place of custody which<br />

was secure but which would also provide such vocational facilities to make incarceration<br />

tolerable.<br />

The influence of the Wootton Report on official deliberations in Ireland prior to the<br />

introduction of community service strongly suggested that community service would<br />

31 The extent to which Irish courts at present give prominence to rehabilitation as an aimof sentencingmayhave shiftedanumber of degrees in favour of proportionate sentences which<br />

include rehabilitation but also include elements of desert andavoidance of risk.<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!