12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

particularly in cases of drunk-driving where there was no previous conviction. 45 Two<br />

Judges in separate focus groups acknowledged that they might occasionally use a<br />

community service order where no custodial sentence is immediately contemplated,<br />

especially in cases where heavy fines are otherwise imposed or where the offender may be<br />

deemedto be in needof structure in his/her lifestyle.<br />

However, if the sanction of community service is decoupled from the necessity to impose<br />

a custodial sentence, it is argued that community service would be used much more<br />

extensively by judges in the District Court in lieu of fines, probation orders and even<br />

conditional discharges. Such use would not be in keeping with the use of community<br />

service as an alternative to custody but rather would be used much more extensively by<br />

District Court Judges as an alternative to other non-custodial sanctions.<br />

Arguably, the result of such an increase in the use of community service in this manner<br />

would be to increase the number of persons in prison on the basis that the compliance rate<br />

with community service in Ireland is 81% of all community service orders, which figure is<br />

very close to the international average of compliance with community service (Walsh and<br />

Sexton 1999, Comptroller andAuditor General Value for Money2004).<br />

It is argued that if community service is decoupled from its pre-custodial requirement and<br />

used as a generalised sanction, it would be difficult to limit the discretionary jurisdiction in<br />

sentencing by judges as advocated by the Expert Group (1999). If the sanction was to be<br />

used as suggested, significant costs would follow upon the expansion in the use of the<br />

sanction. Moreover it is probable that a greater number of offenders might enter into<br />

prison upon breach if the scheme was used as a generalised penalty. Accordingly any<br />

further discussion upon the uncoupling of community service from the pre-custodial<br />

requirement must specifically address the significant costs attendant upon such expansion<br />

andthe likelihoodof increasingthe number of committals to prison.<br />

When questioned about the likely practices which might result from decoupling<br />

community service from the prior custodial requirement, a number of judges expressed a<br />

preference for it as follows:<br />

45 The studyseems to identifyone District Court areawhere this practice is prevalent. The datamayhave been skewedas aresult of this practice in this particular District Court area.<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!