12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Any attempt to reposition the penalty within the punitive paradigm as a substitution for<br />

imprisonment would be likely to meet judicial resistance, as an interference with judicial<br />

independence and discretion (Young 1979; Carnie 1990). The plea to equity by Pease<br />

brought forward a suggestion for a two-tier community service scheme. In this<br />

arrangement the courts could make community service for non-custodial cases up to 120<br />

hours but would be prohibited from imposing community service in excess of 120 hours<br />

with a maximum of 240 hours except for cases where custody was intended as a penalty.<br />

This suggestion has certain merit. However, the ability and propensity of sentencers to<br />

circumvent measures which seek to limit and control their discretion are well documented<br />

(Ashworth 1977) especially when measures are introduced to change already established<br />

practices.<br />

In the surveypart of this study, one of the judges who favoureddecouplingthe community<br />

service fromanyprior custodial requirement suggested:<br />

“…I would suggest that we should have extra gradations of sentence i.e. communityservice without<br />

the sentence hanging over it. … For example so many hours, maybe 60 hours would be the one<br />

without a sentence hanging over it or whatever”. A4J1DC<br />

While another suggested the courts sentencing function would be enhanced by such a<br />

measure byadding:<br />

“…I would also like to see a situation where for something like minor public order offences, that<br />

community service orders could be imposed which if they were complied with would lead to the<br />

effective cleaning of the record for that particular offence. Leaving the accused without any actual<br />

recordof conviction”. A2J1DC<br />

Although courts may resist measures which seek to limit and control their discretion such<br />

as the requirement to combine the community service order with a custodial sentence in<br />

Ireland, these latter views might be interpreted as expanding the role of the Community<br />

Service Order into something which approximates more accurately the original idea of<br />

service to the communityandforgiveness bythat community.<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!