12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Unlike the formal consent of the convicted person which is required under Section 4(1)(b)<br />

of the Criminal Justice (Community Service) Act, 1983 before a court may impose a<br />

community service order upon him/her, such consent is not required under the judge<br />

made procedure before a suspended sentence may be imposed, unless the court specifies<br />

that a formal bond to secure such suspension is required. As previously observed this is<br />

not always the case.<br />

Up until recently, District Court Judges when constructing suspended sentences have<br />

tended to abandon the use of anyrequirement to enter into a bond to keep the peace or to<br />

promise to pay sureties, thereby removing the element of formal consent in the making of<br />

the suspended sentence in the District Court. Instead, some District Court Judges merely<br />

recited that the accused was sentenced to X months imprisonment but the warrant shall<br />

not issue provided the defendant keeps the peace and is not further convicted for an<br />

offence within a specified period of time. Although the consensual element is removed, a<br />

clear custodial sentence has been pronounced in the order and the conditions for its non-<br />

activation are equally set out. Although Rottman and Tormey (1985:216) have preferred<br />

to characterise this procedure as a deferment of sentence, such sentence has all the<br />

hallmarks of a suspended sentence except for the requirement for the convicted person to<br />

enter into a formal bond to keep the peace. An order that the warrant is not to issue<br />

provided that the convicted person is not further convicted within a specified period,<br />

where the custodial period has been specified in the order, is much more closely related to<br />

the classical suspended sentence rather than the type of deferred sentence referred to in<br />

this chapter where the ultimate penaltyis unspecified until the final disposal of the case.<br />

Thus the use of this form of hybrid suspended sentence by some District Court judges<br />

removes all trace of the consent element from the disposition. What remains is still a<br />

suspended sentence recited in open court and recorded as such, but the convicted person<br />

is not allowed the same formal degree of participation which is provided if s/he enters into<br />

a formal bond. However, it is customary for a District Court judge when imposing a<br />

suspended sentence to directlyaddress the convicted person and to specifyto him/her the<br />

conditions which are required to be fulfilled if the custodial sentence is not to be activated.<br />

The degree of participation by the convicted person in this exercise may be either non-<br />

existent or s/he may acknowledge his/her obligations pursuant to the conditional<br />

315

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!