12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

As noted, the procedure under Section 99(9) is mandatory on the court whereas<br />

procedures under Section 99(13) and (14) are discretionary on the part of the Garda<br />

Siochana, the Prison Governor and the Probation Service. It is not quite clear why the<br />

activation of the suspended sentence would continue to be enforceable after the expiration<br />

of the period of suspension under Section 99(13) and (14) but would not be so enforceable<br />

under Section 99(9). Moreover, except for the general case lawapplicable in respect of the<br />

issue in delayin taking prosecutions (The State (O’Connell) – v -Fawsitt 1996 I.R. 362) and<br />

delay within the courts in dealing expeditiously with cases (People (D.P.P) – v – Arthurs<br />

2000 2 ILRM 363), there is no time limit at all applicable in respect of cases brought back<br />

for revocation under Section 99(13) and (14). This precise time limitation was anticipated<br />

in the 1967 Bill where under Section 50(2) which provided that all suspended sentences no<br />

matter how long would be unenforceable after 3 years “except in the event of a breach<br />

during that period of a condition subject to which it was suspended” (Section 50(2)).<br />

Thus, notwithstanding the strict time limit placed on enforceability under Section 50(2) of<br />

the 1967 Bill, there was to be no ambiguity on the making of a complaint for breach after<br />

the same period hadexpired.<br />

So, besides the issue of conditionalitywhich will be discussed in the next section, the other<br />

critical component of the newstatutory suspended sentence is the issue of time limits and<br />

the duration of the sanction. A revocation of a suspended sentence pursuant to Section<br />

99(9) and (10) must commence with a subsequent conviction obtained within the period of<br />

suspension (Section 99(9)). A subsequent conviction obtained after the period of<br />

suspension, but in respect of an offence committed during the period of suspension is not<br />

amenable to the revocation process under Section 99(9). On the other hand the Garda<br />

Siochana, a Prison Governor or a Probation Officer may apply for a revocation of a<br />

suspended sentence at their discretion after the period of suspension has expired on the<br />

basis that the offender “has contravened” a condition of the suspended sentence. Thus,<br />

the time limits are quite circumscribed for the mandatory procedure (Section 99(9)) where<br />

a court must remand a convicted person subject to a suspended sentence, but the time<br />

issues are apparently open-ended for the discretionaryprocedure under Section 99(13) and<br />

(14).<br />

However, the time limits discussed above relate to the periods during which an application<br />

to revoke a suspended sentence may be made. Somewhat different time considerations<br />

378

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!