12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There remains a significant deficit of information on the rehabilitative effect, if any, of<br />

both community service and the suspended sentence in Ireland. Further research needs to<br />

be undertaken in this area to test the assumption that rehabilitation is the ideal to be served<br />

andthat it works.<br />

It has been possible however to identify from the research a number of features of the<br />

sanctions which if addressed may assist in the enhancement and efficacy of each sanction.<br />

These include the elevation of consent by the offender to be bound by either sanction,<br />

where first the offender is given a clear understanding of what the sanction means and<br />

what is required to ensure compliance, and secondly the internalisation of the sanction as<br />

fair bythe offender. Thus better outcomes for both sanctions maybe expected if the court<br />

itself fully explains and engages with the offender when the sentence is given. It is also<br />

recommended that the part-suspended sentence could be more usefully deployed in the<br />

case of drug and sex offenders if conditions as to treatment were imposed for the custodial<br />

part of the sentence as a condition to the suspension of the latter part of the sentence. In<br />

this way the therapeutic input could be commenced at an early stage in the rehabilitation<br />

process.<br />

The interdependent nature of the administration of sentences such as community service<br />

orders and the suspended sentence requires inputs from a number of agencies. The judges<br />

are not fully confident that a suspended sentence or a community service order will be re-<br />

entered by the relevant agency such as the Prosecution or the Probation Service.<br />

Ownership of the sanction is seen to pass from the court to the enforcement agency but<br />

the courts have evinced a reluctance to relinquish the control of the sanction until theycan<br />

be assured that the sentences will be appropriately monitored. Likewise Halton (2006) has<br />

identified distrust by probation officers of the judges in her research. Perhaps a frank<br />

exchange between the various actors in the sentencing process on these issues would allow<br />

a more optimal use of these sanctions.<br />

408

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!