12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

these considerations are subject to the principle of proportionality when finally the court<br />

decides the sentence to be imposed. If judges utilise the community service order and the<br />

suspended sentence as a genuine decarcerative measure, the ideal of rehabilitation may be<br />

seen to take prominence in the disposal. However, if the penalties are utilised as stand<br />

alone measures, they acquire a more punitive persona. When the suspended sentence or<br />

the community service order is made, those given responsibility to supervise the order,<br />

usually the probation service, may not necessarily know from which of these perspectives<br />

the sentencing court made the original sentence. Consequently, the welfarist paradigm of<br />

the Probation Service may be in conflict with the Justice paradigm of the sentencing<br />

courts. This constant tension will be examined in this study by reference to the judges’<br />

perceptions of the issues of ownership of the sanctions. Is it possible that a court may<br />

punish and help the offender at the same time or is it the case as Allen (1981) claims that<br />

all rehabilitative approaches degenerate into punitive approaches when appliedin a criminal<br />

justice context?<br />

The study is also facilitated by the comprehensive study on community service orders by<br />

Walsh & Sexton (1999). In particular, the statistical information on the use of the<br />

community service order is clearly established having regard to the large sample used in<br />

that study. However, this present study takes as a point of departure the question of why<br />

and how judges utilise the sanctions in the manner in which theydo and what theyexpect<br />

to achieve by doing so. By clarifying the issues on whether judges utilise the two sanctions<br />

as stand alone penalties or as alternatives to custodial penalties, it may be possible to gain<br />

greater understanding of the general approach which judges in Ireland take when they<br />

approach the function of sentencing.<br />

Insider Perspective :The Researcher<br />

The writer has been a judge of the District Court for 14 years and deals with criminal cases<br />

on a daily basis. It is observed that the criminal justice system would grind to a halt if the<br />

very high degree of guilty pleas was to decrease, such is the volume of cases disposed of<br />

dailybyall of the criminal courts in Ireland. Consequently, the function most performed by<br />

judges exercising criminal jurisdiction in Ireland is that of sentencing itself. To date, no<br />

specific piece of legislation has been enacted to define and prescribe the sentencing<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!