12.08.2013 Views

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

View/Open - CORA - University College Cork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

custody “made no sense at all” (A8J1SC). Notwithstanding the general public sentiment<br />

that non-custodial sanctions should be used in preference to custody (National Crime<br />

Council Forum 1998) it is evident from the annual statistical returns on sentencing that the<br />

courts are far from enthusiastic to adopt such an approach to sentencing (Courts Service<br />

Annual Report 2004,2005,2006). Moreover, the general use of community service since<br />

1984 has remained consistentlylowrelative to custodial sentencing during the same period.<br />

In 2006 only 1158 community service orders were made in total by all of the criminal<br />

courts in Ireland (Petrus VFM2009). 51<br />

But howwould one knowif a custodial sentence was originallyintended when community<br />

service is applied as a sentence? Senator O’Leary’s cautionary comment that sentencers<br />

often threaten to send a person to prison without really intending to give effect to such<br />

admonitions is apposite when considering the intentionality of sentencers to impose<br />

communityservice orders.<br />

The judges’ responses to questions on the likely outcome of breach proceedings were<br />

analysed to discern the original intention to genuinely substitute a custodial sentence with<br />

the alternative of communityservice.<br />

In the qualitative study of judges` practices and intentions, those interviewed with few<br />

exceptions held strongly to the view that once a case is returned to court for an alleged<br />

breach of community service the sentence of imprisonment is invariably imposed upon a<br />

finding of breach. This suggests that a custodial sentence was actually intended originally<br />

and was then substituted by community service. These views were expressed<br />

notwithstanding the power of the court to deal with the offender “in any manner” under<br />

Sections 7-11 Criminal Justice (Community Service) Act 1983. In support of this the<br />

followingviews are taken fromthe study:<br />

“I woulddeal with it punitively.”A1J9HC<br />

“Instant incarceration.”A1J7DC<br />

“Similar … orders are indivisible.”A1J5DC<br />

51 The Petrus report reveals that communityservice is not utilisedin a significant number of courts andcourt areas.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!