- Page 1 and 2: (BIO)FUELING INJUSTICE? Europe’s
- Page 3 and 4: Executive summary Adding value to t
- Page 5 and 6: The EU has various strategic intere
- Page 7 and 8: or animal feed is turned over to gr
- Page 9 and 10: Methodology: combining authoritativ
- Page 11 and 12: Detailed recommendations To the EU
- Page 13 and 14: d. Support sustainable small-scale
- Page 15 and 16: plans, so that biofuels mandates an
- Page 17 and 18: 5.2. Linking Europe biofuel policie
- Page 19: List of boxes, figures and tables T
- Page 23 and 24: ange of recent sources, including f
- Page 25 and 26: 2. The evolution since 2010: the ri
- Page 27 and 28: 2.2. A growing opposition Faced wit
- Page 29 and 30: Commonwealth Development Corporatio
- Page 31 and 32: Mozambique 10% ethanol and 5% biodi
- Page 33 and 34: - standards for distribution of bio
- Page 35 and 36: To summarise, the EU and its Member
- Page 37 and 38: 4. Case studies Three case studies
- Page 39 and 40: squirrels which damaged between 60%
- Page 41 and 42: not, or not adequately, consulted,
- Page 43 and 44: The Markala Sugar Project will also
- Page 45 and 46: Peasants’ Conference against Land
- Page 47 and 48: unit is “currently providing majo
- Page 49 and 50: 5. How European biofuel policies dr
- Page 51 and 52: iofuels between 2003 and 2006 (6.6
- Page 53 and 54: iofuels production should thus alwa
- Page 55 and 56: ecological and social impacts in pr
- Page 57 and 58: occur in these regions.” 232 Howe
- Page 59 and 60: 5.2.4. Making land a bankable inves
- Page 61 and 62: 6. The social, human rights and env
- Page 63 and 64: While agrofuel related crops are gr
- Page 65 and 66: should be remarked however that the
- Page 67 and 68: project”. In particular, the repo
- Page 69 and 70: it has nevertheless been shown abov
- Page 71 and 72:
deductions to the company.” 348 G
- Page 73 and 74:
mechanisms in African countries to
- Page 75 and 76:
specialised in EU affairs suggests
- Page 77 and 78:
climate change in June or July 2012
- Page 79 and 80:
sometimes partial. 418 The findings
- Page 81 and 82:
Another argument of the EU for its
- Page 83 and 84:
8. The EU and EU Member States’ v
- Page 85 and 86:
However, whereas the Commission spe
- Page 87 and 88:
esources towards this goal. 479 Yet
- Page 89 and 90:
conclude with absolute certitude wh
- Page 91 and 92:
When potential negative impacts are
- Page 93 and 94:
Access to remedies ETO Principle 37
- Page 95 and 96:
9.2. The way forward: EU and its Me
- Page 97 and 98:
Sources ActionAid and Friends of th
- Page 99 and 100:
European Commission and Joint Resea
- Page 101 and 102:
environmental data for the biofuels
- Page 103 and 104:
Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) o
- Page 105 and 106:
United Nations Special Rapporteur o
- Page 107 and 108:
AFRICAN NATIONAL OIL CORPORATI ON S
- Page 109 and 110:
ITAL SENEGAL SARL BBE SA (BERTOLA B
- Page 111 and 112:
LONHRO Agriculture (Subsidiary of L
- Page 113 and 114:
Annex III. Jatropha related project
- Page 115 and 116:
services delivery project of the Di
- Page 117 and 118:
Source: Africa Europe Faith and Jus
- Page 119 and 120:
GERMANY Flora EcoPower ETHIOPIA Oro
- Page 121 and 122:
Investor country SWEDEN Sekab UNITE
- Page 123 and 124:
SWEDISH SEKAB Bioenergy Tanzania Lt
- Page 125 and 126:
KINGDOM BELGIUM Felisa Investor cou
- Page 127 and 128:
Finally, a number of cases studies
- Page 129 and 130:
political, economic and social back
- Page 131 and 132:
Endnotes 1 A. Graham, S. Aubry, R.
- Page 133 and 134:
31 For an overview of the intrsumen
- Page 135 and 136:
68 The Commission is preparing a "E
- Page 137 and 138:
100 Merian Research and CRBM, “Th
- Page 139 and 140:
149 FIAN Germany, “Land Grabbing
- Page 141 and 142:
193 C. Bowyer and B. Kretschmer,
- Page 143 and 144:
230 J. W. van Gelder with L. German
- Page 145 and 146:
264 P. B. Matondi and P. Mutopo,
- Page 147 and 148:
298 L. Cotula, “Land deals in Afr
- Page 149 and 150:
342 Bread for All, “Concerns of B
- Page 151 and 152:
375 K. Havnenik, “Grabbing of Afr
- Page 153 and 154:
419 E.g. “While inheritance laws
- Page 155 and 156:
456 European Commission, “Increas
- Page 157 and 158:
international organisations” in J
- Page 159 and 160:
521 United Nations Special Rapporte
- Page 161:
http://www.fian.org/resources/docum