(Bio)Fueling Injustice? - Europafrica
(Bio)Fueling Injustice? - Europafrica
(Bio)Fueling Injustice? - Europafrica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
water allocation to the investors, this happens to the detriment of local communities as<br />
they are facing decreasing water availability. And while some agrofuel crops may grow<br />
without much water– as they may theoretically grow on “degraded lands” –, the World<br />
Bank notes that “because production may be optimized by irrigation, there is a<br />
possibility that these crops will use scarce water resources in the already arid<br />
countries where they are planted.” 309 A recent report written for the European<br />
Commission notes that today’s investments in biofuel production may influence the<br />
development of water demand, and “substantially expanded biofuel production may<br />
impose water related food security challenges in low income countries”. 310<br />
The right to water of local communities is also particularly impacted by agrofuel<br />
projects. Similarly to the right to food, the right to water implies that there should be<br />
enough water available, including for drinking; personal sanitation and household<br />
hygiene, and that is should be physically and economically accessible. 311 Yet, as<br />
discussed above, agrofuel related projects are very demanding in water, potentially<br />
impacting the availability of water. As shown in the example of agrofuel projects in<br />
Kenya’s Tana River region in 4.3, there is already evidence that local communities are<br />
facing decreased water availability due to decreasing water levels of the river or of<br />
groundwater levels. Furthermore, the Kenyan case shows that the available water is<br />
increasingly polluted.<br />
A recent right to water impact assessment of the Addax <strong>Bio</strong>energy project conducted<br />
by Waterlex and Bread for All for instance concludes that there are high risks that the<br />
right to water is breached if the deal goes forward as planned (see Box 3). This same<br />
analysis also underlines the impact of the project on the quality of water – another<br />
component of the right to water – which can be severely affected by the introduction of<br />
chemicals and fertilisers necessary to large-scale production, in countries that often do<br />
not have the necessary equipment to manage these devastating effects of industrial<br />
agriculture.<br />
The case studies in chapter 4 show that agrofuel projects directly affect the access to<br />
water of local communities.<br />
BOX 3 AN EXAMPLE OF THE IMPACT OF AGROFUELS ON THE RIGHT TO<br />
WATER: ADDAX BIOENERGY<br />
As mentioned above, the investment of Addax <strong>Bio</strong>energy in Sierra Leone also raises<br />
issues of access to natural resources (see below Box 4). One development bank (the<br />
European Investment Bank) refused to support the project due to non-compliance with<br />
its environmental standards, and there are particularly concerns as to its impact on the<br />
right to water.<br />
Waterlex and Bread for All have assessed based on publicly available documents<br />
and direct communications with the company, the extent to which the project complies<br />
with the right to water. 312 While the report acknowledges “the positive action taken by<br />
the company” which “clearly set this project as a positive example for biofuel<br />
production projects in Sierra Leone”, it indicates that “several aspects of the project<br />
present potential risks and exposures which could to complicity, or the suggestion of<br />
complicity, in Human Rights violations during implementation and completion of the<br />
66