(Bio)Fueling Injustice? - Europafrica
(Bio)Fueling Injustice? - Europafrica
(Bio)Fueling Injustice? - Europafrica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
should be remarked however that the negative impacts of high food prices are on the<br />
short or middle term, and that in the long term, some studies do not exclude a positive<br />
effects of high food prices, but under certain circumstances. 294<br />
As we will see below, employment opportunities and the level of incomes created by<br />
the investment in biofuels do not allow to have a safe access to food via the market<br />
especially in the context of food price volatility.<br />
6.2. Access to land and water<br />
In most African countries, the land formally belongs to the state, which plays a key role<br />
in land allocation. 295 The State is thus a central actor to deal with the recent<br />
investments in land. However, land ownership is in practice very complex in Africa,<br />
as land rights are often customary, or the management of the land is delegated to a<br />
village or a community. 296 In addition, in many of these countries, land policies – i.e.<br />
policies defining how people use and interact with the land 297 – are weak and do not<br />
efficiently protect customary land rights. 298 Formalised land tenure rights would exist<br />
for at most 10% of the land, and mostly in urban areas. 299 In many African countries,<br />
there are little requirements in terms of environmental and social impact assessments<br />
prior to commercial or development projects, and they are often poorly enforced when<br />
they exist. 300<br />
As the case of Mali illustrates (part 4.2), due to the lack of appropriate recognition and<br />
effective protection of customary land rights and systems, States are abusing the fact<br />
that they are formal owners of all lands to arbitrarily dispossess local communities of<br />
their use rights in order to allocate the lands to investors. This practice amounts in Mali<br />
and other countries to violations of the rights to housing and food of the affected<br />
population.<br />
The promotion of large scale production leads to the concentration of land ownership,<br />
rather than a fair land distribution that allows the local population to benefit from it. 301<br />
Large scale investments stimulated by the EU biofuel policy create uncertainty and<br />
instability regarding the status and the use of the land. This has important negative<br />
consequences on poverty alleviation, as it has been shown that security of tenure is a<br />
key dimension to reduce hunger and poverty, and it encourages farmers to better<br />
maintain and develop the land. 302<br />
Agrofuel crops rely heavily on water for their production. 303 Agrofuel and food export<br />
feedstock thus necessarily enters into competition with water needed for food<br />
production for local consumption, leading the World Bank to state that the effect of<br />
biofuels on the availability and quality of water for agriculture is “a major concern,” 304<br />
while the OECD and the FAO came to similar conclusions. 305 In a conference<br />
organised by the German government at Bonn in November 2011, a wide range of<br />
actors equally acknowledged “the water, energy and food Security Nexus,” including<br />
with agrofuels. 306 Access to water, more than land, was at the core of the problem in<br />
several cases (see Box 4), so that some talk of a “water grab.” 307 In most cases, it<br />
seems that the contracts between the investors and the host states do not regulate<br />
access to water appropriately. 308 In other cases, such as the Malian project presented<br />
in 4.2, contracts contain provisions on access to water. However, if states guarantee<br />
65