05.01.2014 Views

Annual Report and Accounts - The Great Western Hospital

Annual Report and Accounts - The Great Western Hospital

Annual Report and Accounts - The Great Western Hospital

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5 Remuneration of senior managers (Executive Directors)<br />

In May 2010 the Committee received benchmark information on Executive salaries. <strong>The</strong><br />

Committee considered market dynamics, internal relativities <strong>and</strong> the risk to the organisation of<br />

losing key staff. Pay increases were therefore agreed in respect of 2010/11 for three Executive<br />

Directors following assessment of the pay market. <strong>The</strong>re were no inflationary increases for<br />

Executive Directors.<br />

In April 2011 the Remuneration Committee decided not to agree an inflationary increase for<br />

Executive Directors. A further review of those salaries against the market was undertaken <strong>and</strong> it<br />

was resolved to pay a non-pensionable <strong>and</strong> non-recurring uplift of 4% in recognition of hard work in<br />

delivering the Trust strategy.<br />

Having regard to the future the Committee has considered recent developments in remuneration<br />

practice in the public sector, advice from Hay Group <strong>and</strong> the recommendations of the Hutton<br />

<strong>Report</strong>, particularly the proposition that a proportion of executives’ pay should be at risk. <strong>The</strong><br />

opportunity was taken to introduce the concept with the appointment of a new Chief Executive. A<br />

basic salary was approved with the opportunity to earn an additional 20% if agreed performance<br />

measures are met. <strong>The</strong> Committee has a clear view that there must be a vigorous threshold to be<br />

achieved before payment of all or part of the variable element can be considered. It is intended to<br />

introduce variable pay for Executive Directors from April 2013.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Committee recognises that Directors’ remuneration does not in all cases reflect current market<br />

levels <strong>and</strong> therefore to ensure the Trust can continue to recruit <strong>and</strong> retain high calibre Directors, the<br />

Committee plans to undertake a fundamental review of Executive Director remuneration during<br />

2012/13. <strong>The</strong> Committee aspires to offer top quartile remuneration for top quartile performance.<br />

4.6 Performance of senior managers<br />

<strong>The</strong> appraisal process adopted in 2009/10 for the Chief Executive <strong>and</strong> Executive Directors involves<br />

a 360 degree assessment of each Director against a range of competencies based on those<br />

devised by Hay Group for Foundation Trust Directors <strong>and</strong> an assessment of performance against a<br />

set of objectives agreed with each individual. This provides an effective system for setting individual<br />

objectives <strong>and</strong> performance measures each year. <strong>The</strong> process has been used to assess<br />

performance in 2011/12 <strong>and</strong> to set objectives for 2012/13. In the case of the Chief Executive the<br />

review is carried out by the Chair <strong>and</strong> for other Directors by the Chief Executive. <strong>The</strong> Committee<br />

receives a summary report into the performance of each Director.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Committee reviewed approaches to Board assessment <strong>and</strong> development <strong>and</strong> commissioned<br />

the National Institute for Innovation <strong>and</strong> Improvement, who had developed a Board Development<br />

Tool (BDT) for Foundation Trusts to undertake a review of its effectiveness. This was undertaken<br />

in the summer of 2011 <strong>and</strong> is continuing. <strong>The</strong> Committee was also keen to ensure that the Trust<br />

established a longer term relationship with Board development external partners as members felt<br />

that this would be beneficial in the Board’s ongoing development.<br />

Page 46 of 211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!