READIT-2007 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The ‘System Quality’ refers to the technological characteristics of the OMS. This includes the capability of the organization to develop and maintain OMS in terms of quality human resource(developers and users) and advanced hardware & software. It also includes the level of integration : how much of the accessible memory is online and available through a single interface. In addition it includes the quality of search and retrieval functions. The ‘Information Quality’ defines the quality of the memory content in terms of its richness, the linkages and to the extent to which it meets the needs of the users on a long terms basis. The ‘use’ refers to the utilization of the outputs of the system and can be used to measure the success of the system when the usage of the system is voluntary. ‘User satisfaction’ measures the users’ perception of the system. Use and user satisfaction will influence each other. The usage of OMS by an individual will produce an impact on his / her performance in the work place. Each individual impact will in turn have an impact on the performance of the Organization, though it may not be a simple addition. Managing Organizations Memory It is usually perceived that an organization will benefit from using OM. However, it does not happen always. The Organizational benefit depends on the context in which OM is used. For example, if in a situation where a non routine response was required, the usage of OM resulted in a routine decision, organizational performance deteriorates. Hence, effective management of OM is necessary for improved organizational performance. Also management actions are required for creation and implementation of OM Policies, Procedures and Standards, ensure adequate resources to develop and maintain OM, monitoring the usage of OM and ensure its effectiveness, adequate training to users , encourage the OM usage and orient the organizational culture to facilitate the effective growth and usage of OM. The growth and usage of OM is tightly linked to the organizational culture that promotes sharing between organizational members. Sharing culture can be promoted through management support and by reward system used by the organization to assess individual performance. Changing Organizational culture is time consuming and the management need to make available the time and other resources required for this change management. CONCLUSION Organizational knowledge is the combined knowledge of all employees both in explicit and tacit form. Organizational Memory is the repository of data, information and knowledge about the past events & activities in an organization and that possessed by various organizational entities. It is applied to decision making regarding future events & activities. OMS are systems built to support the capture and application of OM. In general, it is perceived that application of OM will result in improved organizational performance. However, it is not ensured unless the management of OMS are effective. Management of OMS need to have strategy to identify the content and application of OM. It is also required to monitor the usage of OM and its impact on Organization’s performance. REFERENCES 1. Ackerman, M. (1994) “Definition and contextual issues in Organizations and Group Memories”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE ComputerSociety 198
2. Bonanno, K. (2003) “Knowledge Management : a people process” in Nimon,M.(ed), connecting challenges ; issues for teacher and children’s librarians, Auslib Press, Adelaide. 3. Davenport,T. and Prasak.L (1998) “Working Knowledge – How Organizations manage what they know”, Harvard Business School Press 4. Delone W.H. and Mclean E.R (1992)”Information System Success: The Guest for the Dependent Variable” Information Systems Research 5. Earl, M.J. (1999) “Opinion : What is a Chief Knowledge Officer” Sloan Management Review. 6. Hibbard, J.(1997) “Knowing what one know” Information week 7. Mc Dermott, R and Carla O’ Dell (2000) “Overcoming the Cultural Barriers to sharing knowledge”, APQC Web Page. 8. Jennex. M.E and Olfman.L (2002) “ Organizational Memory / Knowledge Effects on Productivity, a longitudinal Study”, Proceeding of the 35 th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society 9. Malhotra, Y., (1996) “Organizational Learning and Learning Organizations : An Overview,” URL=www.brint.com/papers/orglrg.htm. 10. Nonanka, I (1991) “The knowledge creating company” Harward Business Review. 11. Quinn, R.E and Rhorbaugh. J (1983)”AQ Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria” Towards a competing values approach to Organizational Analysis” Management Science. 12. Stein E.W and Zwass V (1995)”Actualizing Organizational memory with Information Systems “ Information Systems Research 13. Sveiby K.E., (2001) “Knowledge Management – Lessons from the Pioneers”, http://jobfunctions.bnet.com/whitepaper.aspx?docid=165684 14. Walsh, J.P and G.R.Ungson (1991), “Organizational Memory”, Academy of Management Review 199
Page 1 and 2:
Conference on Recent Advances in In
Page 3 and 4:
CONTENTS INVITED TALKS “Bodhi”
Page 5 and 6:
Dr. Sanjay K Kaushik and Vijendra S
Page 7 and 8:
Tacit Knowledge Contextual Mental P
Page 9 and 10:
documents can become knowledge repo
Page 11 and 12:
objects to form a conceptual networ
Page 13 and 14:
Global highly competitive fast ch
Page 15 and 16:
knowledge would always be packaged
Page 17 and 18:
If our human filters are all too mu
Page 19 and 20:
6. Booch, G. (1993). Object-Oriente
Page 21 and 22:
development (Balyan, R.K. 2007). Th
Page 23 and 24:
4. NEW FOUND ROLES / RESPONSIBILITI
Page 25 and 26:
human resource development in the k
Page 27 and 28:
Those librarians who have the neede
Page 29 and 30:
of information using formal and inf
Page 31 and 32:
high quality information and by net
Page 33 and 34:
and underpin information management
Page 35 and 36:
everywhere on the Internet, existin
Page 37 and 38:
11. RESOURCES SHARING AND NETWORKIN
Page 39 and 40:
influence the organization’s know
Page 41 and 42:
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN DIGITAL INF
Page 43 and 44:
Thirdly Knowledge Management promot
Page 45 and 46:
6. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: COMMON AND
Page 47 and 48:
7. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SOLUTION IN
Page 49 and 50:
Knowledge and Information Managemen
Page 51 and 52:
to a broad collection of organizati
Page 53 and 54:
Information technology is a tool fo
Page 55 and 56:
In the library world, there is a le
Page 57 and 58:
more science in public domain. Seve
Page 59 and 60:
Web-of Science which covers Science
Page 61 and 62:
Creation of digital contents and in
Page 66 and 67:
University Libraries - Metamorphosi
Page 68 and 69:
• Management skills - motivating,
Page 70 and 71:
KM will play an essential role, and
Page 72 and 73:
4. INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND HEALTH INF
Page 74 and 75:
Safety Knowledge Management System
Page 76 and 77:
Multimedia Data Mining in Digital L
Page 78 and 79:
The Multimedia Data Mining (MDM) is
Page 80 and 81:
performed at the global or local le
Page 82 and 83:
REFERENCES 1. Sinha, Manojkumar and
Page 84 and 85:
- Information explosion - Prolifera
Page 86 and 87:
also go together for adding visual
Page 88 and 89:
6.2 Format This refers to the abili
Page 90 and 91:
Using Knowledge mapping to support
Page 92 and 93:
- Be aware of organizational level
Page 94:
application of knowledge providing
Page 99 and 100:
By implementing these strategies, t
Page 101 and 102:
detectors are suitable for detectin
Page 103 and 104:
iii) Response Indicator II. Confirm
Page 105 and 106:
5. CONCLUSION Present day libraries
Page 107 and 108:
The objective of the archives is: 1
Page 109 and 110:
custody and two copies are made for
Page 111 and 112:
DIGITAL PRESERVATION ISSUES AND FAL
Page 113 and 114:
epresentation, provenance, fixity a
Page 115 and 116:
) Technical c) Resource challenges.
Page 117 and 118:
There are many cost factors to cons
Page 119 and 120:
This knowledge would vanish from th
Page 121 and 122:
The key issues were: - Development
Page 123 and 124:
as there would be changes in compet
Page 125 and 126:
Digital Preservation and Online Acc
Page 127 and 128:
Physical deterioration of digital m
Page 129 and 130:
7. POLICIES FOR DIGITIZATION 1. Meg
Page 134 and 135:
Library 2.0: Myth or Reality ? E.So
Page 136 and 137:
Web 1.0 Web 2.0 DoubleClick --> Goo
Page 138 and 139:
and chooses tagging, tag clouds, fo
Page 140 and 141:
and access can be given through com
Page 142 and 143:
writes, injures, defaces, cuts, mut
Page 144 and 145:
to have access to restricted areas.
Page 146 and 147:
Internet Usage by Research Scholars
Page 148 and 149:
Kumar and Amritpal Kaur (2004) 5 st
Page 150 and 151:
whereas fifteen respondents use it
Page 152 and 153:
Fully satisfied Table 12 Satisfacti
Page 154 and 155:
Information Security: The role of D
Page 156 and 157:
Identifier Owner suffix 10-1003 / 0
Page 158 and 159:
is costly affair. However, it is a
Page 160 and 161:
(IR) and providing their own digita
Page 162 and 163:
As per the data of Home Ministry of
Page 164 and 165:
4.8 Cyber Defamation: Cyber defamat
Page 166 and 167:
4.18 Web jacking Forceful taking of
Page 168 and 169:
Under the circumstances, the Librar
Page 170 and 171:
10. CONCLUSION Cyber crimes in Indi
Page 172 and 173:
2. STATE AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITIES
Page 174 and 175:
Table- 2: Library Network facilitie
Page 176 and 177:
Table- 4: OPAC / Web OPAC Facilitie
Page 178 and 179: 6.6 Electronic surveillance Librari
Page 182 and 183: Knowledge Management in Academic In
Page 184 and 185: summarizes evolution of Knowledge M
Page 186 and 187: To prove their relevance and value,
Page 188 and 189: functions of the organization. Patr
Page 190 and 191: Knowledge Communication in Academic
Page 192 and 193: y way of conferring it the status o
Page 194 and 195: through face-to-face conversation.
Page 196 and 197: hurdles. Instant message are delive
Page 198 and 199: Knowledge communication network of
Page 200 and 201: As KM and learning activities for o
Page 202 and 203: • Operation personnel are require
Page 204 and 205: Figure-2: Home page for Centralised
Page 206 and 207: Glossary Development Figure-4: Home
Page 208 and 209: Extension of Qualification Systems
Page 210 and 211: Nuclear Knowledge Management (NKM)
Page 212 and 213: Knowledge Sharing Environment (1) B
Page 214 and 215: already possess it. As those worker
Page 216 and 217: - identify critical “at risk” k
Page 218 and 219: open literature, content and TOC cr
Page 220 and 221: FROM MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL K
Page 222 and 223: Organizational Knowledge Organizati
Page 224 and 225: Central Repository Data + Informati
Page 226 and 227: The infrastructure based approach i
Page 230 and 231: KNOWLEDGE: A MARKETABLE COMMODITY A
Page 232 and 233: APPLYING E-COMMERCE TO E-LEARNING E
Page 234 and 235: Role of Libraries in the Knowledge
Page 236 and 237: their scholars to post their articl
Page 238 and 239: Author Index Amudhavalli, A., 143 A
show all

READIT-2007 - Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?