25.01.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>FINAL</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong><br />

Introduction<br />

Lake Ontario receives its water from the four other Great Lakes as well as from drainage from its local<br />

watershed, and it discharges water into the St. Lawrence River. In the 1950s, Canada and the United States<br />

built the St. Lawrence River Hydropower Project, including a dam stretching across the St. Lawrence River<br />

from Massena, New York, to Cornwall, Ontario. The <strong>International</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> (IJC) issued “Orders<br />

of Approval” for the project in 1952 and supplementary orders in 1956. The Orders established criteria<br />

for the operation of the system and also established a Control Board to develop and implement plans of<br />

regulation to meet the orders. A series of plans was investigated and implemented, and in 1963, a new<br />

plan called “1958-D” was approved and put into use. The plan consists of rules for making releases from<br />

the lake every week based on recent water supplies to the lake, how high the lake is, the time of year,<br />

ice conditions, Ottawa River flows, river stages, and a series of flow limits which bound other rules. The<br />

Orders of Approval allow the Control Board to deviate from the written plan, with <strong>Commission</strong> approval,<br />

particularly under extreme high and low water supply conditions. The Control Board has also been granted<br />

authority to institute emergency and discretionary deviations, as detailed later in this report. The Control<br />

Board has often deviated from the plan to meet the intent of the Orders of Approval and provide benefits to<br />

affected interests. These deviations have been necessitated partly by the changing needs of the system<br />

and partly by the wetter and drier supply conditions experienced since 1960 as compared with the period<br />

from 1860 to 1954, which the designers used in the development of Plan 1958-D.<br />

From time to time, the <strong>International</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> considered new plans in an attempt to better meet<br />

the criteria in the Orders of Approval or to provide additional benefits to affected interests. The Great Lakes<br />

Levels Reference Study (1993) recommended a revision and updating of Plan 1958-D. Subsequently,<br />

plans (e.g., Plan 1998) were developed by the Control Board but not implemented by the <strong>Commission</strong><br />

because they did not adequately accommodate environmental concerns or recreational boating needs and<br />

there was a lack of information on impacts on other interests.<br />

The <strong>International</strong> Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River (LOSLR) Study was designed to address those<br />

shortcomings. Unlike the Levels Reference Study, which addressed water management issues on all the<br />

Great Lakes, the LOSLR Study focused only on water level changes and flow regulation on Lake Ontario<br />

and the St. Lawrence River with the existing dam and other water control structures.<br />

Challenges and Opportunities<br />

None of the previous attempts to revise the regulation plan for Lake Ontario has been as comprehensive<br />

and detailed as this Study. Previous evaluations considered changes to the regulation techniques –<br />

modifying outflow limitations and procedures. The Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study approach was<br />

significantly different in that an extensive public involvement program played a key role in the development<br />

and selection of more comprehensive options. The study conducted a comprehensive evaluation of plan<br />

metrics, which are the basis for the development and evaluation of alternative operating plans. It relied on<br />

Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!