25.01.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

I. Common Data Needs Technical Work Group Summary<br />

Data Collection Prioritization<br />

ANNEX 2<br />

An extensive analysis was conducted early in the Study to evaluate the utility of existing data, including<br />

information on landforms (elevation), land cover classifications and photographic/imagery, for all nearshore<br />

wetlands and erodable and flood prone areas. This prioritization effort was based on anticipated needs of<br />

other technical work groups in terms of numeric modeling and impact analyses.<br />

The shoreline of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River was segmented into shore units based on<br />

consistent geomorphic or hydraulic characteristics. Each shore unit was evaluated in terms of existing<br />

conditions (e.g., shore type, substrate, structural protection, adjacent and projected land uses), sensitivity<br />

to water level fluctuations, economic damages expected due to hazards, existing geospatial data, and needs<br />

for additional data collection. These evaluations were ranked based up degree of risk and anticipated need<br />

for new data collection. Figures I-1 and I-2 showcase the results of this analysis for the Lake Ontario and<br />

St. Lawrence River shorelines, respectively. As a function of this analysis, priority assignments were made<br />

for airborne topographic and bathymetric LIDAR collection for elevation data and for image collection<br />

(e.g. aerial photography or satellite imagery) (Figures I-1 and I-2).<br />

Prioritization of Lake Ontario Shore Units<br />

Legend for Ranking<br />

Bathymetry - 1st Priority<br />

Bathymetry - 2nd Priority<br />

R2<br />

Topography - 1st Priority<br />

Topography - 2nd Priority<br />

Imagery - 1st Priority<br />

Imagery - 2nd Priority<br />

Bathymetric LIDAR reconnaissance<br />

summer, 2001<br />

CND12<br />

R1<br />

Bathymetric LIDAR - summer, 2001<br />

CND11<br />

CND7<br />

CND8<br />

CND10<br />

US8<br />

CND6<br />

CND5<br />

CND9<br />

US7<br />

CND4<br />

Lake Ontario<br />

US5 US6<br />

CND2<br />

US4<br />

Topographic LIDAR - spring, 2001<br />

Bathymetric LIDAR - summer, 2001<br />

CND3<br />

CND1<br />

Bathymetric LIDAR - summer, 2001<br />

US1<br />

US2<br />

US3<br />

Topographic LIDAR - spring, 2001<br />

Bathymetric LIDAR - summer, 2001<br />

Topographic LIDAR - spring, 2001<br />

Bathymetric LIDAR - summer, 2001<br />

Figure I-1: Lake Ontario shoreline data collection prioritization<br />

Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!