25.01.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In terms of the coastal interests, the benefits of Plan A + are realized primarily through a gain in the area of<br />

shoreline protection maintenance. Although the benefits are relatively small, Plan A + is the only plan that<br />

achieves a gain in terms of shore protection benefits relative to 1958-DD on Lake Ontario. This is likely<br />

attributable to the tightly regimented range that Plan A + tries to maintain. This range reduces the amount<br />

of downcutting that occurs during low water level periods and yet tries to keep the Lake low enough to<br />

prevent overtopping. Interestingly, this tight range, which tends to have a slightly higher average than<br />

1958-DD, does not slow erosion of unprotected properties.<br />

<strong>FINAL</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong><br />

The increases in damages resulting from Plan B + are likely attributable to the broader range of levels allowed<br />

by the Plan, which provides more opportunity for both downcutting and overtopping. Plan D + does not<br />

differ greatly from 1958-DD.<br />

Table 9 shows the shore protection maintenance benefits under Plan A + to be fairly equally distributed<br />

around the Lake. The disbenefits of Plan B + affect all counties around the lake, but are worse on the south<br />

shore. Plan D + provides a mix of small gains and losses around the lake, which probably indicates that it<br />

is so similar to 1958-DD that it is difficult to distinguish them.<br />

Table 9: Shore Protection Maintenance, by Lake Ontario County, based on the Stochastic<br />

Supply Simulation (average annual values (in million U.S. dollars) discounted at 4% over<br />

30-year period)<br />

In summary, Plan A + is the best of the candidate plans for shoreline interests on Lake Ontario. Its gains<br />

come from benefits associated with the shore protection maintenance performance indicator. However,<br />

Plan A + also causes erosion to happen more quickly than 1958-DD and is similar to Plan B + in that respect.<br />

Plan A + also causes increased flooding downstream, as does Plan B + . Plan D + is slightly worse for shore<br />

protection maintenance than 1958-DD but, overall, does not cause significant harm to shoreline interests<br />

on the Lake or upper river relative to 1958-DD. Plan D + is the only plan that provides coastal benefits on<br />

the lower river relative to 1958-DD.<br />

Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!