25.01.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. Recreational Boating and Tourism Technical Work Group Summary<br />

Objectives<br />

The Recreational Boating and Tourism Technical Work Group was charged with developing: (1) a general<br />

assessment of the impact of recreational boating on the study area, (2) performance indicators that would<br />

show the effects of changing water levels on recreational boating and tourism interests, and (3) ideal criteria<br />

for water levels that would best meet the needs of recreational boaters and associated businesses.<br />

ANNEX 2<br />

Data Collection and Evaluation Methodology<br />

A three-pronged approach was developed, with each approach involving a different group and a different<br />

method of assessing the impacts of water level changes. The members of the first group, recreational<br />

boaters, were surveyed by phone to determine their use of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River, then<br />

by mail for specific information about expenditures and the impacts of high and low water levels on their<br />

use of the area. Those in the second group, marina and yacht club owners, were contacted in person and<br />

by phone to assess the impacts of fluctuating water levels and to obtain physical measurements of depths<br />

at slips and boat launching facilities. The third group, charter and tour boat operators, was surveyed by<br />

mail and phone to assess the impacts of fluctuating water levels on such businesses. All data was<br />

collected in 2002 and 2003.<br />

For recreational boaters, a sample of 10,382 U.S. boat owners was drawn from boats registered in the<br />

eight counties bordering Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River, using only boats in the “pleasure boat”<br />

category with non-commercial addresses. The sample was stratified by boat length and by geographic<br />

region. Boaters were contacted by telephone to determine if they had boated on Lake Ontario or the<br />

St. Lawrence River in 2002. If they had, they were sent a mail questionnaire asking them more detailed<br />

questions about their boating experiences and expenditures.<br />

In Canada, a list of registered boats was not available. Therefore, a telephone survey of the general population<br />

living in the study area was conducted to determine the number of boaters using study waters in 2002.<br />

However, not enough boaters could be obtained by this method to permit a more detailed mail survey.<br />

Instead, a mail survey was sent to Canadian Power Squadron members living in the study area to obtain<br />

the more detailed information about boating experiences and expenditures. The questionnaire was the<br />

same as the one used in the U.S. However, this group was considered representative not of all Canadian<br />

boaters, but of only those using marinas and yacht clubs. To estimate performance indicators for boat<br />

launch ramp users and private dock owners, ratios developed from U.S. data (e.g., days boated by marina<br />

users/days boated by launch ramp users) were applied to the Canadian power squadron data.<br />

In the case of marina and yacht club owners, an inventory of all marinas, yacht clubs, and state/provincial<br />

or privately run boat launch ramps was conducted during the summer of 2002. In personal interviews<br />

conducted by field staff, services provided at each marina and yacht club were inventoried. Operators<br />

were asked about impacts to their business from both high and low water conditions, the cost of those<br />

actions taken to mitigate, and whether any revenue was lost. Depth measurements were taken at selected<br />

slips and launching facilities and used to determine the point at which the slip or launch ramp could not be<br />

used and thus when benefits would be lost.<br />

Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!