25.01.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table A-1: Constraints Applied to Each Plan<br />

Constraint 58-DD A + B + D +<br />

6,230 m3/s (220,000<br />

ft3/s) ice formation<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

ANNEX 3<br />

J+ limit in winter<br />

570 m3/s and<br />

1,420 m3/s (20,000<br />

and 50,000 ft3/s) ><br />

75.2 m (246.7 ft).<br />

During ice mgmt –<br />

700 m3/s (25,000<br />

ft3/s). Outside of ice<br />

mgmt – 700 m3/s<br />

(25,000 ft3/s), unless<br />

Lake Ontario > 75.5 m<br />

(247.7 ft), then<br />

1,400 m3/s<br />

(49,400 ft3/s).<br />

During ice mgmt – 700 m 3 /s<br />

(25,000 ft3/s). Outside of ice<br />

mgmt – 700 m3/s (25,000 ft3/s)<br />

unless Lake Ontario > 75.5 m<br />

(247.7 ft) then 1,420 m3/s<br />

(50,000 ft3/s). J limit rarely comes<br />

into play outside of ice mgmt due<br />

to plan stability of releases;<br />

sometimes required during fall<br />

drawdown in high lake years.<br />

Usually 400 m 3 /s<br />

(14,000 ft3/s) but<br />

700 m3/s (25,000<br />

ft3/s) if Lake Ontario<br />

level > 0.3 m (1 ft)<br />

above target.<br />

Limit to min. level<br />

at Long Sault or<br />

Saunders HW in<br />

winter<br />

Yes. Incremental<br />

down to 71.8 m<br />

(235.6 ft) at Long<br />

Sault.<br />

Yes. One hard<br />

constraint at 71.8 m<br />

(235.6 ft).<br />

Yes. One hard constraint at<br />

71.8 m (235.6 ft) at Long Sault.<br />

Yes. Progressive<br />

constraint down to<br />

71.2 m (233.6 ft).<br />

With Ice Qmax =<br />

9,340 m3/s<br />

(330,000 ft3/s)<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes. A specific rule that limits<br />

flows through Coteau Control<br />

Structure to maximum of<br />

2,500 m3/s (88,300 ft3/s) based<br />

on local inflows and maximum<br />

Beauharnois capacity.<br />

Yes.<br />

Qtrm after ice<br />

Qmax = 9,900 m3/s<br />

(349,500 ft3/s)<br />

Yes. Set at<br />

9,500 m3/s<br />

(335,500 ft3/s).<br />

Yes. Set at<br />

9,900 m 3 /s<br />

(349,500 ft3/s).<br />

Yes. A specific rule that limits<br />

flows through Coteau Control<br />

Structure to a maximum of<br />

2,500 m3/s (88,300 ft3/s) based<br />

on local inflows and maximum<br />

Beauharnois capacity.<br />

Yes. Set at<br />

9,500 m3/s<br />

(335,500 ft3/s).<br />

2nd qtrm after ice<br />

Qmax = 10,300 m3/s<br />

(363,800 ft3/s)<br />

Yes. Set at<br />

10,000 m3/s<br />

(353,000 ft3/s).<br />

Yes. Set at<br />

10,000 m3/s<br />

(353,000 ft3/s).<br />

Yes. A specific rule that limits<br />

flows through Coteau Control<br />

Structure to a maximum of 4,000<br />

m3/s (141,200 ft3/s) based on<br />

local inflows and maximum<br />

Beauharnois capacity.<br />

Yes. Set at<br />

10,000 m3/s<br />

(353,00 ft3/s).<br />

Open water with<br />

Seaway Qmax =<br />

10,700 m3/s<br />

(377,900 ft3/s)<br />

Yes, if Lake Ontario<br />

level > 75.8 m<br />

(248.7 ft).<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes, if Lake Ontario level ? 75.7 m<br />

(248.4 ft), else the lessor of<br />

11,500 m3/s (406,100 ft3/s) or<br />

channel capacity.<br />

Yes, if Lake Ontario<br />

level > 0.77 m (2.5 ft)<br />

above target,<br />

otherwise 9,910 m3/s<br />

(350,000 ft3/s).<br />

Open water closed<br />

Seaway Qmax=11,500<br />

m3/s (406,100 ft3/s)<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Qmax < max hydraulic<br />

channel capacity<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Iroquois HW < 75.6 m<br />

(248.0 ft)<br />

No rule applied,<br />

but there were no<br />

occurrences in the<br />

stochastic case.<br />

No rule.<br />

Yes. A specific rule is applied that<br />

supercedes all other constraints.<br />

No rule applied, but<br />

there were no<br />

occurrences in the<br />

stochastic case.<br />

Perfect ice indicator<br />

forecast<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

“Fair” St. Louis<br />

forecast<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Yes.<br />

Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!