25.01.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Determining a critical elevation for plan performance measures for residential systems is difficult given that<br />

little documented data exist. However, based on available information, a flurry of complaints from Thousand<br />

Islands area residents were filed with Environment Canada in the fall and winter of 1998, and other reports<br />

were documented near Massena, New York, during the same time period. Reports were also received in<br />

November of 2002 from U.S. residents in the Thousand Islands area. Furthermore, most reported problems<br />

from the August 2003 shore well survey appear to have occurred from 1998 onward. At the time the<br />

reports occurred, Lake Ontario was at its lowest level in 30 years—a monthly average in November 1998<br />

of 74.40 m (244.03 ft). In 2002, when other reports surfaced in the same geographic area, lake levels<br />

were only slightly higher than in 1997—74.46 m (244.30 ft). Therefore, based on available information,<br />

a lake elevation of about 74.37 m (244.00 ft) could serve as plan performance measure for shore wells<br />

along Lake Ontario. Along the upper St. Lawrence, substantial problems with water levels and lake intake<br />

lines were reported beginning in August of 1997 and throughout 1998 along Lake St. Lawrence. Longterm<br />

historical data for Lake St. Lawrence (e.g., the Long Sault gauge) were not available at the time this<br />

report was written, but the above dates could serve as a reference point for selecting an appropriate<br />

critical water level.<br />

ANNEX 2<br />

PMCL advertised in local papers asking people if they had problems withdrawing water from the River, and<br />

the few responses received indicated that people fixed any problems themselves. The Wilson Hill community,<br />

which had been affected by this problem, has since obtained municipal water supplies. Although the<br />

economic impacts associated with this phenomenon could not be quantified, it was tracked to see how<br />

reliably each plan produced water levels above the elevations at which such problems were said to begin.<br />

Lower St. Lawrence River<br />

Municipal and industrial intakes<br />

Based on the survey results, the main problems experienced by water utilities are taste and odour, frazil ice<br />

and capacity. Taste and odour and frazil problems are not necessarily directly related to low water levels in<br />

all cases but tend to increase in such conditions, according to utilities. A total of 42% of the utilities suffer<br />

from taste and odour problems, while 50% experience frazil problems. Capacity limitations in low water<br />

levels were mentioned by three utilities out of 30.<br />

The impacts of low water levels on plant operation were characterized by red and yellow production<br />

performance indicators. The red production performance indicator describes a severe consequence<br />

corresponding to the water level at which a plant will no longer be able to supply nominal capacity using<br />

the available infrastructures (i.e. pumping stations and water intakes). Alternatively, the yellow<br />

performance indicator describes the water level at which a plant will need to open its emergency intake to<br />

supply nominal capacity (i.e., modify its normal operating condition). This performance indicator therefore<br />

represents an alarm sign indicating that the nominal capacity of the plant can no longer be maintained by<br />

the principal intake. A yellow performance indicator could only be determined for plants disposing of more<br />

than one intake.<br />

The critical water levels (red performance indicator) for each plant downstream of Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue<br />

are summarized in Figure F-1.<br />

With respect to the red production performance indicator, the plants that are the most affected by water<br />

levels are: Lavaltrie, Montreal (Atwater and DesBaillets), Verchères, Pointe-Claire, St-Lambert and Candiac.<br />

These seven systems will reach the red production performance indicator at water levels above the worst<br />

case scenario studied, which is 1.0 metre (3.3 ft) below the chart datum at Pointe-Claire (70 cm (28 in)<br />

below the historical minimum level). These plants represent 23% of the plants investigated (7/30) and<br />

more than 74% of the population of the study area (1,720,000/2,320,000). The Varennes WTP would see<br />

its normal operating conditions restricted (yellow PI) under the worst water level scenario considered.<br />

Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!