25.01.2014 Views

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Collection of detailed bathymetric and topographic surveys in wetland areas using boat surveys was<br />

acceptable, although not all wetland sites were mapped with desired sounding densities due to dense<br />

vegetation growth. Surveys of this type are expensive and require substantial labour to conduct.<br />

ANNEX 2<br />

Use of Flood Damage Reduction Program (FDRP) maps in Ontario to delineate topographic detail in<br />

wetland areas was unacceptable. The accuracy of these base maps was not sufficient to derive dependable<br />

0.5-metre contour accuracies in these environments.<br />

Airborne LIDAR data collection was carried out on the lower St. Lawrence River floodplain in November<br />

and December 2001. Collection of conventional bathymetric and topographic LIDAR survey data was<br />

conducted in Quebec in early May 2001, and within acceptable error bounds, providing maximum utility<br />

throughout the remainder of the Study process. The upland extent of these surveys included all areas that<br />

could be inundated under all potential regulation scenarios. Collection of topographic LIDAR surveys of<br />

the floodplains along the lower St. Lawrence River in autumn was very successful, providing maximum<br />

coverage with the lowest-cost technology.<br />

Figure I-3: Irondequoit Bay and Rochester, New York, digital elevation model<br />

Imagery Collection/Processing<br />

Aerial photography was collected over many of the nearshore areas where intensive investigations would<br />

be conducted by other technical work groups (e.g. Coastal, Environmental, Recreational Boating, Municipal<br />

Water Use). Aerial photography was also the basis for photogrammetric terrain derivations and feature<br />

collection efforts. If resources were more extensive, comprehensive collection of high resolution<br />

(i.e., 0.15-m (0.5-ft) pixels) photography/imagery would have been preferable.<br />

High resolution satellite imagery (1 to 5-m (3 to 16-ft) pixels) was only utilized for the Montreal archipelago<br />

region. This type of information could have utility elsewhere, but can be expensive, and it can also be<br />

logistically difficult to obtain coverage over large tracts of irregular geography.<br />

Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!