- Page 1 and 2: FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
- Page 3: FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
- Page 7 and 8: Each candidate plan fulfills two of
- Page 9 and 10: New Candidate Regulation Plans The
- Page 11 and 12: The basic data and information coll
- Page 13 and 14: FINAL REPORT Section Table of Conte
- Page 15 and 16: 21: Lac St. Louis annual water leve
- Page 17 and 18: FINAL REPORT Introduction Lake Onta
- Page 19 and 20: without developing the capability o
- Page 21 and 22: owners during times of extremely hi
- Page 23 and 24: The timing of water availability wi
- Page 25 and 26: The Study Board considered the impa
- Page 27 and 28: In this Study, the Shared Vision mo
- Page 29 and 30: FINAL REPORT The Role of the Plan F
- Page 31 and 32: Hydroelectric Power Generation The
- Page 33 and 34: Table 1: Key Environmental Performa
- Page 35 and 36: Significant new study research incl
- Page 37 and 38: Environment • Although constructi
- Page 39 and 40: By dynamically integrating all the
- Page 41 and 42: Pre-project releases tend to be ver
- Page 43 and 44: The Public Interest Advisory Group
- Page 45 and 46: FINAL REPORT Criteria and Regulatio
- Page 47 and 48: • Hydropower energy and value;
- Page 49 and 50: egulation plan ranged from mild sup
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 9 shows a comparison of the
- Page 53 and 54: Other Plans The Study Board conside
- Page 55 and 56:
To reduce the risk of Lake Ontario
- Page 57 and 58:
The Study Board asked for a stochas
- Page 59 and 60:
Plan Hydrology Plan A + tends to pr
- Page 61 and 62:
St. Lawrence River at Long Sault FI
- Page 63 and 64:
St. Lawrence River at Montreal Harb
- Page 65 and 66:
Level (m IGLD 1985) Level (ft. IGLD
- Page 67 and 68:
Level (m IGLD 1985) Level (ft. IGLD
- Page 69 and 70:
Overall Plan Results All of the can
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 6: Economic Results by Intere
- Page 73 and 74:
The Plan Formulation and Evaluation
- Page 75 and 76:
Environmental Results All candidate
- Page 77 and 78:
Equity Considerations Plan A + ’s
- Page 79 and 80:
A key finding of the hydropower gro
- Page 81 and 82:
losses relative to 1958-DD, but the
- Page 83 and 84:
In terms of the coastal interests,
- Page 85 and 86:
it did before the dam was built. In
- Page 87 and 88:
for the stochastic simulations. In
- Page 89 and 90:
FINAL REPORT Figure 42: Five-year m
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 12: Summary of Overall Econom
- Page 93 and 94:
Plan D + performs well economically
- Page 95 and 96:
The candidate plans were not evalua
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 14: Summary of Overall Econom
- Page 99 and 100:
Recreational Boating Validation The
- Page 101 and 102:
Short-term deviations can be define
- Page 103 and 104:
The definition of extreme events at
- Page 105 and 106:
FINAL REPORT Public Information and
- Page 107 and 108:
• Concerns regarding shoreline er
- Page 109 and 110:
FINAL REPORT Mitigation and Other M
- Page 111 and 112:
The overall approach of this Study,
- Page 113 and 114:
Reference is made to “Improving H
- Page 115 and 116:
The obvious question is, where will
- Page 117 and 118:
Information Access In past Internat
- Page 119 and 120:
FINAL REPORT Peaking and Ponding in
- Page 121 and 122:
Water Diversions There are presentl
- Page 123 and 124:
FINAL REPORT Funding Acknowledgemen
- Page 125 and 126:
Marjorie Hare Toronto, Ontario Elai
- Page 127 and 128:
Hydroelectric Power Technical Work
- Page 129 and 130:
Economics Advisory Committee John H
- Page 131 and 132:
FINAL REPORT Glossary of Terms ABIO
- Page 133 and 134:
CRITERIA - A principle or standard
- Page 135 and 136:
GOVERNANCE SYSTEM - The complex, dy
- Page 137 and 138:
MEASURE, NON-STRUCTURAL - Any measu
- Page 139 and 140:
RESERVOIR - A place where water is
- Page 141 and 142:
FINAL REPORT a. Study Board Referen
- Page 143 and 144:
Farrell, J. M., et al. Esocid Early
- Page 145 and 146:
c. Coastal Processes Baird, W. F. a
- Page 147 and 148:
e. Hydroelectric Power Effect of Op
- Page 149 and 150:
Fan, Y., and D. Fay (Jan. 2003). Up
- Page 151 and 152:
Documents Generated by Other Source
- Page 153 and 154:
FINAL REPORT Words The Words Before
- Page 155 and 156:
FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
- Page 157 and 158:
FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
- Page 159 and 160:
FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
- Page 161 and 162:
FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
- Page 163 and 164:
International Lake Ontario - St. La
- Page 166 and 167:
ANNEX ES Section Table of Contents
- Page 168:
Table C10: Economic results for can
- Page 171 and 172:
ANNEX 1 Pertinent Document 1 Intern
- Page 173 and 174:
ANNEX 1 9. The Study Board shall ke
- Page 175 and 176:
ANNEX 1 Evaluations Several of the
- Page 177 and 178:
ANNEX 1 Pertinent Document 3 Orders
- Page 179 and 180:
ANNEX 1 WHEREAS the Commission on 9
- Page 181 and 182:
ANNEX 1 of ensuring such compliance
- Page 183 and 184:
ANNEX 1 (k) (l) The Hydro-Electric
- Page 185 and 186:
ANNEX 1 APPENDIX B General Plan sho
- Page 187 and 188:
ANNEX 2 A. Environmental Technical
- Page 189 and 190:
ANNEX 2 Context As in the case of t
- Page 191 and 192:
ANNEX 2 Table A-1: Lake Ontario/Upp
- Page 193 and 194:
ANNEX 2 At the request of the Study
- Page 195 and 196:
ANNEX 2 It is important to note tha
- Page 197 and 198:
ANNEX 2 Participants Environmental
- Page 199 and 200:
ANNEX 2 Mingelbier M, Brodeur P. an
- Page 201 and 202:
ANNEX 2 (d) Values and perceptions
- Page 203 and 204:
ANNEX 2 6. Expected Consequences of
- Page 205 and 206:
ANNEX 2 Wilcox, D.A. and Meeker, J.
- Page 207 and 208:
ANNEX 2 In the case of charter and
- Page 209 and 210:
ANNEX 2 Figures B-2 to B-8 depict t
- Page 211 and 212:
ANNEX 2 Table B-2: Ideal Criteria f
- Page 213 and 214:
ANNEX 2 Figure B-6: Lac St. Louis R
- Page 215 and 216:
ANNEX 2 B. Recreational Boating and
- Page 217 and 218:
ANNEX 2 recently recognized as a UN
- Page 219 and 220:
ANNEX 2 Boaters were asked in the l
- Page 221 and 222:
ANNEX 2 Table B-3: Output and Emplo
- Page 223 and 224:
ANNEX 2 Most uncertainties in our e
- Page 225 and 226:
ANNEX 2 C. Coastal Processes Techni
- Page 227 and 228:
ANNEX 2 Erosion of Developed, Unpro
- Page 229 and 230:
ANNEX 2 Lake bed downcutting is ano
- Page 231 and 232:
ANNEX 2 Erosion of Unprotected Prop
- Page 233 and 234:
ANNEX 2 Importance of the Stochasti
- Page 235 and 236:
ANNEX 2 The erosion of unprotected
- Page 237 and 238:
ANNEX 2 • The susceptibility of s
- Page 239 and 240:
ANNEX 2 Doyon, B., Dallaire, É., R
- Page 241 and 242:
ANNEX 2 (b) Number of stakeholders
- Page 243 and 244:
ANNEX 2 c. Sediment Budget performa
- Page 245 and 246:
ANNEX 2 evaluation of a new potenti
- Page 247 and 248:
ANNEX 2 • Increasing the upper li
- Page 249 and 250:
ANNEX 2 9. References Baird and Ass
- Page 251 and 252:
ANNEX 2 (e) Significant statutory,
- Page 253 and 254:
ANNEX 2 3. Potentially Significant
- Page 255 and 256:
ANNEX 2 6. Expected Consequences of
- Page 257 and 258:
ANNEX 2 9. References Bouillon, M.-
- Page 259 and 260:
ANNEX 2 Performance Indicators Comm
- Page 261 and 262:
ANNEX 2 then translated into costs.
- Page 263 and 264:
ANNEX 2 D. Commercial Navigation Co
- Page 265 and 266:
ANNEX 2 In Canada, a large proporti
- Page 267 and 268:
ANNEX 2 h. Effect of last high or l
- Page 269 and 270:
ANNEX 2 3. Potentially Significant
- Page 271 and 272:
ANNEX 2 Key trends and issues that
- Page 273 and 274:
ANNEX 2 (2) The maximum gradients t
- Page 275 and 276:
ANNEX 2 E. Hydroelectric Power Gene
- Page 277 and 278:
ANNEX 2 In addition to seasonal var
- Page 279 and 280:
ANNEX 2 Analysis Analysis shows tha
- Page 281 and 282:
ANNEX 2 E. Hydroelectric Power Gene
- Page 283 and 284:
ANNEX 2 The St. Lawrence power proj
- Page 285 and 286:
ANNEX 2 Hydro-Québec Production mu
- Page 287 and 288:
ANNEX 2 4. Key Baseline Conditions
- Page 289 and 290:
ANNEX 2 The power entities at Moses
- Page 291 and 292:
ANNEX 2 10. Review Process The Hydr
- Page 293 and 294:
ANNEX 2 • problems related to sou
- Page 295 and 296:
ANNEX 2 74.1 m (243.0 ft). Three fa
- Page 297 and 298:
Contrecoeur Longueuil SSPI Île-Per
- Page 299 and 300:
ANNEX 2 Summary of Key Findings •
- Page 301 and 302:
ANNEX 2 2. Performance Indicators
- Page 303 and 304:
ANNEX 2 G. Aboriginal Peoples Conte
- Page 305 and 306:
ANNEX 2 H. Hydrology and Hydraulics
- Page 307 and 308:
ANNEX 2 Climate Change Scenario Dev
- Page 309 and 310:
ANNEX 2 Hydrological Information an
- Page 311 and 312:
ANNEX 2 Participants Hydraulics and
- Page 313 and 314:
ANNEX 2 Ottawa River Regulation Pla
- Page 315 and 316:
ANNEX 2 Prioritization of Upper and
- Page 317 and 318:
ANNEX 2 Figure I-4: South Colwell P
- Page 319 and 320:
ANNEX 2 J. Information Management T
- Page 321 and 322:
ANNEX 2 Document Management System
- Page 323 and 324:
ANNEX 2 Participants Common Data an
- Page 325 and 326:
ANNEX 3 A. Plan Formulation Guide:
- Page 327 and 328:
ANNEX 3 A more sophisticated approa
- Page 329 and 330:
ANNEX 3 B. Regulation Plan Descript
- Page 331 and 332:
ANNEX 3 Need for a Simulator of Pla
- Page 333 and 334:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-1: Lake Ontario Av
- Page 335 and 336:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-5 shows that there
- Page 337 and 338:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-6: Lac Saint Louis
- Page 339 and 340:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-10: Cumulative Fre
- Page 341 and 342:
ANNEX 3 Comparing the frequencies s
- Page 343 and 344:
ANNEX 3 Use Plan 1998 J limit The J
- Page 345 and 346:
ANNEX 3 IF Lake Ontario level >= 74
- Page 347 and 348:
ANNEX 3 Candidate Regulation Plan D
- Page 349 and 350:
ANNEX 3 The three adjustments based
- Page 351 and 352:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-16: Montreal Harbo
- Page 353 and 354:
ANNEX 3 Approach Rule curves Lake r
- Page 355 and 356:
ANNEX 3 5. Apply the M, L, I and J
- Page 357 and 358:
ANNEX 3 Plan D + uses the short-ter
- Page 359 and 360:
ANNEX 3 The further away from the t
- Page 361 and 362:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-21B: Ogdensburg le
- Page 363 and 364:
Score ANNEX 3 Figure B-21J: Cardina
- Page 365 and 366:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-24A: Lake Ontario
- Page 367 and 368:
ANNEX 3 Figure B-27: Lac St. Louis
- Page 369 and 370:
ANNEX 3 Examples Example 1: Calcula
- Page 371 and 372:
ANNEX 3 Operationalizing Plan D + I
- Page 373 and 374:
ANNEX 3 Plan E The release for this
- Page 375 and 376:
ANNEX 3 Plan 1998 Plan 1998 is the
- Page 377 and 378:
ANNEX 3 OntRip3: Plan Designed for
- Page 379 and 380:
ANNEX 3 RecBoat: Plan Designed for
- Page 381 and 382:
ANNEX 3 Impacts were graphed in eve
- Page 383 and 384:
ANNEX 3 Table C-1: Average annual d
- Page 385 and 386:
ANNEX 3 Economic Results (Historica
- Page 387 and 388:
ANNEX 3 Environmental Results (Hist
- Page 389 and 390:
ANNEX 3 Four Extreme Stochastic Seq
- Page 391 and 392:
ANNEX 3 Table C-9: Economic results
- Page 393 and 394:
ANNEX 3 Table C-11: Environmental r
- Page 395 and 396:
ANNEX 3 Table C-13: Environmental r
- Page 397 and 398:
ANNEX 3 Four Climate Change Sequenc
- Page 399 and 400:
ANNEX 3 Table C-17: Economic result
- Page 401 and 402:
ANNEX 3 Participants Plan Formulati
- Page 403 and 404:
ANNEX 4 Mitigation Action Plan Summ
- Page 405 and 406:
ANNEX 4 Action Plan Canada, as a ru
- Page 407 and 408:
ANNEX 4 To resolve the dilemma, a c
- Page 409 and 410:
ANNEX 4 8. DRAFT REPORT LANGUAGE.
- Page 411 and 412:
ANNEX 4 The AMAP has three principa
- Page 413 and 414:
ANNEX 4 Environmental monitoring Pu
- Page 415 and 416:
ANNEX 4 Monitoring would be a volun
- Page 417 and 418:
ANNEX 4 The Challenge of Funding Ad
- Page 419 and 420:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AVERAGE WATER LEV
- Page 421 and 422:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS DIGITAL ELEVATION
- Page 423 and 424:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS FUNGIBILITY - Som
- Page 425 and 426:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS INTERNATIONAL ST.
- Page 427 and 428:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS OXIC - To expose
- Page 429 and 430:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS RIPARIAN - Of, re
- Page 431:
GLOSSARY OF TERMS WATERFOWL - Birds