FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Historical Time Series (1900-2000) Economic Results for Candidate Plans (Plus Plan E) ANNEX 3 Table C-2: Economic results for candidate plans by interest and region based on THE historical supply sequence Average Annual Net Benefits ($M) Plan A + Plan B + Plan D + Plan E 3 Total $7.52 $6.48 $6.52 -$12.30 COASTAL -$0.62 -$1.11 $0.32 -$25.96 Lake Ontario -$0.36 -$0.60 $0.25 -$23.12 Shore Protection Maintenance -$0.23 -$0.49 $0.27 -$12.98 Erosion to Unprotected Developed Parcels -$0.13 -$0.10 -$0.02 -$0.29 Flooding -$0.01 -$0.01 -$0.01 -$9.85 Upper St. Lawrence River $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$1.56 Flooding $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$1.56 St. Lawrence -$0.25 -$0.51 $0.07 -$1.27 Flooding -$0.22 -$0.47 -$0.02 -$1.21 Shore Protection Maintenance -$0.03 -$0.04 $0.09 -$0.07 COMMERCIAL NAVIGATION $0.41 $2.20 $2.31 $4.13 Lake Ontario -$0.04 -$0.02 -$0.01 -$0.01 Seaway $0.53 $2.28 $2.35 $4.15 Montreal down -$0.08 -$0.06 -$0.03 $0.00 HYDROPOWER $3.50 $5.97 $1.82 $14.16 NYPA-OPG $3.51 $4.16 $1.04 $10.23 Hydro Quebec -$0.01 $1.81 $0.78 $3.93 RECREATIONAL BOATING $4.23 -$0.58 $2.04 -$4.64 Above Dam $2.21 -$0.62 $0.52 -$5.91 Lake Ontario $1.29 -$0.64 $0.13 -$5.03 Alex Bay $0.89 -$0.05 $0.32 -$0.86 Ogdensburg $0.01 $0.00 $0.01 -$0.09 Lake St. Lawrence $0.02 $0.06 $0.06 $0.07 Below Dam $2.02 $0.04 $1.53 $1.27 Lac St. Louis $1.13 $0.17 $0.77 $0.78 Montreal $0.70 -$0.02 $0.58 $0.41 Lac St. Pierre $0.19 -$0.10 $0.17 $0.08 M&I $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SL One-time infrastructure costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LSL Water Quality Investments $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Notes to Table C-2: 1. Figures represent the average annual impact relative to Plan 1958-DD, in millions of U.S. dollars. Blue indicates a positive net benefit relative to 1958-DD and red indicates a negative net benefit relative to 1958-DD. 2. These are economic results based on the historical supply series (representing 1900-2000). No discount rate is applied. 3. Plan E is shown for comparison purposes only to represent the natural flow condition. Plan E is not a candidate plan. Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows 215
ANNEX 3 Economic Results (Historical) for Interest-Specific and Reference Plans Table C-3: Economic results by interest and region for the interest-specific and reference plans based on the historical supply sequence RecBoat OntRip3 1998 1958-D Total -$20.55 -$8.07 -$0.03 -$40.91 COASTAL -$1.77 $0.94 -$0.80 -$46.66 Lake Ontario $0.74 $0.95 -$0.98 -$43.07 Shore Protection Maintenance $0.90 $0.77 -$0.97 -$20.04 Erosion to Unprotected Developed Parcels -$0.16 $0.18 $0.00 -$0.12 Flooding $0.00 $0.00 -$0.02 -$22.91 Upper St. Lawrence River $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$2.73 Flooding $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 -$2.73 St. Lawrence -$2.51 -$0.01 $0.18 -$0.85 Flooding -$2.46 -$0.08 $0.09 -$0.82 Shore Protection Maintenance -$0.05 $0.07 $0.09 -$0.04 COMMERCIAL NAVIGATION -$3.91 $0.48 -$0.03 $2.97 Lake Ontario -$0.22 -$0.05 -$0.01 -$0.01 Seaway -$3.04 $0.54 $0.01 $3.01 Montreal down -$0.65 $0.00 -$0.03 -$0.03 HYDROPOWER -$18.72 -$3.90 -$0.45 $5.09 NYPA-OPG -$3.78 -$5.24 $0.02 $3.54 Hydro Quebec -$14.94 $1.34 -$0.47 $1.55 RECREATIONAL BOATING $3.90 -$5.59 $1.05 -$2.51 Above Dam $2.46 -$6.66 $1.02 -$2.82 Lake Ontario $2.14 -$4.57 $0.69 -$2.15 Alex Bay $0.35 -$2.07 $0.30 -$0.67 Ogdensburg $0.02 -$0.02 $0.01 -$0.06 Lake St. Lawrence -$0.04 $0.01 $0.03 $0.06 Below Dam $1.44 $1.08 $0.04 $0.32 Lac St. Louis $0.80 $0.60 $0.10 $0.17 Montreal $0.61 $0.39 -$0.03 $0.15 Lac St. Pierre $0.03 $0.09 -$0.04 $0.00 M&I -$0.05 $0.00 $0.20 $0.20 SL One-time infrastructure costs -$0.05 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 LSL Water Quality Investments $0.00 $0.00 $0.20 $0.20 Notes to Table C-3: 1. Figures represent the average annual impact relative to Plan 1958-DD, in millions of U.S. dollars. Blue indicates a positive net benefit relative to 1958-DD and red indicates a negative net benefit relative to 1958-DD. 2. These are economic results based on the historical supply series (representing 1900-2000). No discount rate is applied. 216 Options for Managing Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River Water Levels and Flows
Page 1 and 2:
FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
Page 3:
FINAL REPORT Options for Managing L
Page 6 and 7:
FINAL REPORT current operating regi
Page 8 and 9:
FINAL REPORT The current regulation
Page 10 and 11:
FINAL REPORT If none of the candida
Page 12 and 13:
FINAL REPORT Divergent Viewpoints T
Page 14 and 15:
FINAL REPORT Transition to Implemen
Page 16 and 17:
FINAL REPORT 10: Priority Performan
Page 18 and 19:
FINAL REPORT a considerable amount
Page 20 and 21:
FINAL REPORT The plan consists of a
Page 22 and 23:
FINAL REPORT Figure 2: The Lake Ont
Page 24 and 25:
FINAL REPORT 2. Criteria and regula
Page 26 and 27:
FINAL REPORT water level and flow d
Page 28 and 29:
FINAL REPORT Independent Review Ind
Page 30 and 31:
FINAL REPORT Coastal Processes The
Page 32 and 33:
FINAL REPORT The current estimate o
Page 34 and 35:
FINAL REPORT Table 2: Economic Perf
Page 36 and 37:
FINAL REPORT • Shore protection m
Page 38 and 39:
FINAL REPORT Abbreviations STELLA -
Page 40 and 41:
FINAL REPORT Approach 2: Optimizati
Page 42 and 43:
FINAL REPORT Evaluation and Screeni
Page 44 and 45:
FINAL REPORT • All performance in
Page 46 and 47:
FINAL REPORT 5. During the Seaway n
Page 48 and 49:
FINAL REPORT The programmed Plan 19
Page 50 and 51:
FINAL REPORT Other efforts showed t
Page 52 and 53:
FINAL REPORT Plan E generally produ
Page 54 and 55:
FINAL REPORT An early version of Pl
Page 56 and 57:
FINAL REPORT Plan Evaluations and C
Page 58 and 59:
FINAL REPORT Table 3: Differences i
Page 60 and 61:
Lake Ontario FINAL REPORT Figure 13
Page 62 and 63:
St. Lawrence River at Lac St. Louis
Page 64 and 65:
FINAL REPORT Figures 29, 30, 32 and
Page 66 and 67:
Discharge (m 3 /s) Discharge (tcfs)
Page 68 and 69:
Level (m IGLD 1985) Level (ft. IGLD
Page 70 and 71:
FINAL REPORT Economic Results All p
Page 72 and 73:
FINAL REPORT Disproportionate Loss
Page 74 and 75:
FINAL REPORT Table 7: Percent Damag
Page 76 and 77:
FINAL REPORT Table 8: Environmental
Page 78 and 79:
FINAL REPORT Beyond the Summary Num
Page 80 and 81:
FINAL REPORT Figure 36: Net economi
Page 82 and 83:
FINAL REPORT On Lake Ontario, lakeb
Page 84 and 85:
FINAL REPORT Coastal damages occur
Page 86 and 87:
FINAL REPORT Figure 39: Wetland pla
Page 88 and 89:
FINAL REPORT Sensitivity Analyses D
Page 90 and 91:
FINAL REPORT Table 11: Summary of E
Page 92 and 93:
FINAL REPORT Figure 43: Lake Ontari
Page 94 and 95:
FINAL REPORT Climate Change Analysi
Page 96 and 97:
FINAL REPORT Table 13: Summary of E
Page 98 and 99:
FINAL REPORT Validation The Plan Fo
Page 100 and 101:
FINAL REPORT Municipal and Industri
Page 102 and 103:
FINAL REPORT Interest-specific shor
Page 104 and 105:
FINAL REPORT Change the Criteria an
Page 106 and 107:
FINAL REPORT Through the advocacy o
Page 108 and 109:
FINAL REPORT 5. People living along
Page 110 and 111:
FINAL REPORT The Study Board consid
Page 112 and 113:
FINAL REPORT • Ecohydrology is th
Page 114 and 115:
FINAL REPORT Institutional issues d
Page 116 and 117:
FINAL REPORT Environmental Data and
Page 118 and 119:
FINAL REPORT The point of access to
Page 120 and 121:
FINAL REPORT Possible Changes in th
Page 122 and 123:
FINAL REPORT 106 Options for Managi
Page 124 and 125:
FINAL REPORT People and Organizatio
Page 126 and 127:
FINAL REPORT Environmental Technica
Page 128 and 129:
FINAL REPORT Common Data and Inform
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
FINAL REPORT BASIN; WATERSHED - The
Page 134 and 135:
FINAL REPORT EROSION - The wearing
Page 136 and 137:
FINAL REPORT INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL
Page 138 and 139:
FINAL REPORT PHYSIOGRAPHY - A descr
Page 140 and 141:
FINAL REPORT TECHNICAL WORK GROUP (
Page 142 and 143:
FINAL REPORT Pacific International
Page 144 and 145:
FINAL REPORT Savage, C. Lake Ontari
Page 146 and 147:
FINAL REPORT Doyon, B., et al. (200
Page 148 and 149:
FINAL REPORT Planning and Managemen
Page 150 and 151:
FINAL REPORT h. Information Managem
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164:
ANNEXES Options for Managing Lake O
Page 167 and 168:
ANNEXES Annex 3 - Plan Descriptions
Page 170 and 171:
ANNEX 1 Annex 1 Pertinent Documents
Page 172 and 173:
The Study Board shall provide optio
Page 174 and 175:
Pertinent Document 2 Plan of Study
Page 176 and 177:
trial regulation plans will need to
Page 178 and 179:
WHEREAS pursuant to the said Applic
Page 180 and 181:
(c) (d) (e) (f) (g) The works shall
Page 182 and 183:
(i) (j) (k) Under regulation, the f
Page 184 and 185:
(b) Control Facilities Adequate con
Page 186 and 187:
ANNEX 2 2 Annex2 Technical Work Gro
Page 188 and 189:
Hydrology, supplies Historical and
Page 190 and 191:
Performance Indicators As noted ear
Page 192 and 193:
Table A-2: Lower St. Lawrence River
Page 194 and 195:
Table A-3: Weighting Scheme for Eco
Page 196 and 197:
In the St. Lawrence River, high spr
Page 198 and 199:
References Armellin, A., Mingelbier
Page 200 and 201:
A. Environmental Contextual Narrati
Page 202 and 203:
types. Analyses of historical aeria
Page 204 and 205:
9. References Listed in text Baedke
Page 206 and 207:
B. Recreational Boating and Tourism
Page 208 and 209:
In addition to recreational boating
Page 210 and 211:
Summary of Key Findings Based on it
Page 212 and 213:
ANNEX 2 Figure B-3: Alexandria Bay
Page 214 and 215:
Participants Recreational Boating a
Page 216 and 217:
Communities along New York waters v
Page 218 and 219:
On the Canadian side, a telephone s
Page 220 and 221:
3. Potentially Significant Benefit
Page 222 and 223:
The average horsepower of motor boa
Page 224 and 225:
Noden, D. and Brown, T. (1975) The
Page 226 and 227:
The Lower St. Lawrence River In com
Page 228 and 229:
Table C-1: Unit Costs for the Const
Page 230 and 231:
Beach Access The beach access perfo
Page 232 and 233:
Since the value of shore protection
Page 234 and 235:
ANNEX 2 Figure C-6: Map of percent
Page 236 and 237:
ANNEX 2 Figure C-8: Map of downstre
Page 238 and 239:
References Baird, W.F. and Associat
Page 240 and 241:
C. Coastal Processes Contextual Nar
Page 242 and 243:
Given the current land use policies
Page 244 and 245:
. In the case of the shore protecti
Page 246 and 247:
e. With the ever increasing urban d
Page 248 and 249:
8. Risk Assessment/Sensitivity Anal
Page 250 and 251:
C. Coastal Processes Contextual Nar
Page 252 and 253:
This interest suffered badly during
Page 254 and 255:
5. Key Trends Construction along ri
Page 256 and 257:
Finally, from a computational stand
Page 258 and 259:
D. Commercial Navigation Technical
Page 260 and 261:
More information on the socio-econo
Page 262 and 263:
Participants Commercial Navigation
Page 264 and 265:
. Number of stakeholders The St. La
Page 266 and 267:
g. Trade flows and current market c
Page 268 and 269:
Commercial navigation costs actuall
Page 270 and 271:
5. Key Trends Provided below are hi
Page 272 and 273:
Another adaptive measure to falling
Page 274 and 275:
f. In Montreal, water levels impact
Page 276 and 277:
U.S. Dollars ANNEX 2 Figure E-1: Sh
Page 278 and 279:
Ice formation Ice cover stability i
Page 280 and 281:
Hydroelectric Power Generation Tech
Page 282 and 283:
Regionally, hydropower is seen main
Page 284 and 285:
NYISO administers the Day Ahead Mar
Page 286 and 287:
(b) The hydropower performance indi
Page 288 and 289:
Synapse Energy Economics Inc. devel
Page 290 and 291:
9. References The Hydroelectric Pow
Page 292 and 293:
F. Municipal, Industrial and Domest
Page 294 and 295:
Taste and odours performance indica
Page 296 and 297:
Determining a critical elevation fo
Page 298 and 299:
Water level in Pointe-Claire (m) Fi
Page 300 and 301:
F. Municipal, Industrial and Domest
Page 302 and 303:
7. Adaptive Behaviours The evaluati
Page 304 and 305:
(d) History of the interest The Akw
Page 306 and 307:
Under this project, the H&H TWG pro
Page 308 and 309:
increases throughout the year. Mixi
Page 310 and 311:
• build operational hydrology for
Page 312 and 313:
Fan, Y. and Fay, D. (2001) Variatio
Page 314 and 315:
I. Common Data Needs Technical Work
Page 316 and 317:
Collection of detailed bathymetric
Page 318 and 319:
• Metadata requirements Metadata
Page 320 and 321:
FTP Support The first component of
Page 322 and 323:
ANNEX 2 Figure J-3: Typical product
Page 324 and 325:
ANNEX 3 Annex 3 Plan Descriptions a
Page 326 and 327:
After discussions, the Plan Formula
Page 328 and 329:
Table A-1: Constraints Applied to E
Page 330 and 331:
Deviations The outflow calculated a
Page 332 and 333:
The following list summarizes the a
Page 334 and 335: ANNEX 3 Figure B-3: Lake Ontario Av
Page 336 and 337: Lake Ontario level (m) 1.9 1.8 1.7
Page 338 and 339: ANNEX 3 Figure B-8: Cumulative Freq
Page 340 and 341: Total winter flow (10 m 3 /s - quar
Page 342 and 343: Plan 1958-DD - Appendix Detailed de
Page 344 and 345: SELECT CASE adjusted supply indicat
Page 346 and 347: If the Lake Ontario level is greate
Page 348 and 349: The inflow category (e.g., wet, dry
Page 350 and 351: Step 5 - Ice limit: Exactly the sam
Page 352 and 353: ANNEX 3 Figure B-18: Plan A + rule
Page 354 and 355: Other rules Plan B + has two additi
Page 356 and 357: Plan D + : Blended Benefits Objecti
Page 358 and 359: ANNEX 3 Figure B-19A: Lake Ontario
Page 360 and 361: ANNEX 3 Figure B-20: Lake Ontario s
Page 362 and 363: ANNEX 3 Figure B-21F: Long Sault Da
Page 364 and 365: Figure B-23 shows the three benefit
Page 366 and 367: Score Figure B-25: Score based on t
Page 368 and 369: Flow Constraints In addition to the
Page 370 and 371: This procedure is repeated until th
Page 372 and 373: Reference and Interest Specific Reg
Page 374 and 375: Plan 1958-D Regulation of Lake Onta
Page 376 and 377: 4. The “I” limits, or ice limit
Page 378 and 379: Figure B-31 compares the scoring re
Page 380 and 381: Experimental variations In simpler
Page 382 and 383: C. Summary Tables of Plan Results T
Page 386 and 387: Environmental Results (Historical)
Page 388 and 389: Stochastic Supply Sequences Economi
Page 390 and 391: Table C-8: Economic results for can
Page 392 and 393: Table C-10: Economic results for ca
Page 394 and 395: Table C-12: Environmental results f
Page 396 and 397: Table C-14: Environmental results f
Page 402 and 403: ANNEX 4 Introduction Annex 4 Mitiga
Page 404 and 405: The great majority of potential act
Page 406 and 407: Great Lakes Advance Emergency Manag
Page 408 and 409: “(b) General Plan. (1) The Secret
Page 410 and 411: Adaptive Management Action Plan (AM
Page 412 and 413: difference in evaluations. If, for
Page 414 and 415: Coastal Monitoring Purpose: Monitor
Page 416 and 417: Adaptive Management Program Summary
Page 418 and 419: GLOSSARY OF TERMS ABIOTIC - Non-liv
Page 420 and 421: COASTAL EROSION - The wearing away
Page 422 and 423: EROSION - The wearing away of land
Page 424 and 425: HYDROLOGIC MODELING - The use of ph
Page 426 and 427: MEASURE, STRUCTURAL - Any measure t
Page 428 and 429: PUBLIC INFORMATION - Activities whe
Page 430 and 431: SUBSTRATE COMPOSITION - Categorical
show all

FINAL REPORT - International Joint Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?