ICT and e-Business in the Pulp, Paper and Paper ... - empirica
ICT and e-Business in the Pulp, Paper and Paper ... - empirica
ICT and e-Business in the Pulp, Paper and Paper ... - empirica
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Pulp</strong>, paper <strong>and</strong> paper products<br />
Exhibit 3-20: Adoption of e-<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g by sector<br />
All 10 sectors<br />
0 10 20 30 40<br />
Send e-<strong>in</strong>voices (B2B)<br />
19<br />
22 Receive e-<strong>in</strong>voices<br />
Food & beverages<br />
Footw ear<br />
<strong>Pulp</strong> & paper<br />
<strong>ICT</strong> manufufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Consumer electronics<br />
Shipbuild<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Tourism<br />
Telecommunications<br />
12<br />
16<br />
17<br />
25<br />
25<br />
19<br />
25<br />
27<br />
26<br />
20<br />
22<br />
26<br />
22<br />
24<br />
35<br />
34<br />
Base (100%): Companies with <strong>in</strong>ternet access. N (for sector, EU-10) = 934. Weight<strong>in</strong>g: by employment (figures<br />
should be read as "enterprises compris<strong>in</strong>g …% of employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector". Questionnaire reference: D5<br />
Source: e-<strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> W@tch (Survey 2006)<br />
For this <strong>in</strong>dicator, <strong>the</strong>re is hardly a difference between micro, small <strong>and</strong> medium-sized<br />
firms <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> P&P <strong>in</strong>dustry. The large firms lead <strong>the</strong> development here (about 30% send<br />
or receive e-<strong>in</strong>voices). This picture is confirmed <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>and</strong> case studies (see<br />
section 4.2).<br />
When only look<strong>in</strong>g at those companies that actually use e-<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> average share<br />
of e-<strong>in</strong>voices (measured as percentage of a company's total <strong>in</strong>voices sent or received) is<br />
slightly lower <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> P&P <strong>in</strong>dustry than on average <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 sectors. Companies that<br />
practise e-<strong>in</strong>voic<strong>in</strong>g report that about 13% of <strong>in</strong>voices sent are e-<strong>in</strong>voices, <strong>and</strong> about 9%<br />
of <strong>in</strong>voices received (see Exhibit 3-21).<br />
Exhibit 3-21: Share of e-<strong>in</strong>voices as % of total <strong>in</strong>voices<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />
<strong>Pulp</strong> & <strong>Paper</strong><br />
(EU-10)<br />
All 10 sectors<br />
(EU-10)<br />
13<br />
9<br />
19<br />
19<br />
15<br />
17<br />
% of <strong>in</strong>voices sent<br />
electronically<br />
% of <strong>in</strong>voices received<br />
electronically<br />
% of turnover correspond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
e-<strong>in</strong>voices<br />
Base (100%): Companies send<strong>in</strong>g/receiv<strong>in</strong>g e-<strong>in</strong>voices (without "don't know"). N (for sector, EU-10) = 149/161.<br />
Questionnaire reference: D6, D7, D8<br />
Source: e-<strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> W@tch (Survey 2006)<br />
57