07.02.2014 Views

ICT and e-Business in the Pulp, Paper and Paper ... - empirica

ICT and e-Business in the Pulp, Paper and Paper ... - empirica

ICT and e-Business in the Pulp, Paper and Paper ... - empirica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pulp</strong>, paper <strong>and</strong> paper products<br />

Exhibit 3-29: Companies receiv<strong>in</strong>g orders from customers onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Accept orders<br />

from<br />

customers<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Receive 1-25%<br />

of orders<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Receive more<br />

than 25% of<br />

orders onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Use specific<br />

<strong>ICT</strong> solutions<br />

for e-sell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Weight<strong>in</strong>g scheme:<br />

% of % of % of % of % of % of % of % of<br />

empl. firms empl. firms empl. firms empl. firms<br />

<strong>Pulp</strong> & <strong>Paper</strong> (EU-10) 26 28 78 77 22 23 19 11<br />

Micro (1-9 empl.) 30 75 25 9<br />

Small (10-49 empl.) 26 80 20 12<br />

Medium (50-249 empl.) 24 77 23 15<br />

Large (250+ empl.) 26 84 16 24<br />

NACE 21.1 (p&p man.) 18 19 77 81 23 19 20 14<br />

NACE 21.2 (convert<strong>in</strong>g) 29 31 78 73 22 27 18 11<br />

All 10 sectors (EU-10) 35 25 73 75 27 25 18 9<br />

Micro (1-9 empl.) 23 79 21 6<br />

Small (10-49 empl.) 26 76 24 12<br />

Medium (50-249 empl.) 29 75 25 16<br />

Large (250+ empl.) 26 74 26 27<br />

Base (100%)<br />

firms us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

computers<br />

firms accept<strong>in</strong>g<br />

orders onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

firms accept<strong>in</strong>g<br />

orders onl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

firms us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

computers<br />

N (for sector, EU-10) 964 271 271 964<br />

Questionnaire reference F4 F6 F6 F10<br />

* Data are not displayed because <strong>the</strong> number of observations <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual countries is too low for this <strong>in</strong>dicator.<br />

** Data only <strong>in</strong>dicative due to low number of observations (N ~ 25-50).<br />

Source: e-<strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> W@tch (Survey 2006)<br />

As <strong>in</strong> 2005, e-<strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> W@tch asked companies whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y "support market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

sales processes by specific <strong>ICT</strong> solutions." The rationale for this question is to fur<strong>the</strong>r test<br />

to what extent <strong>the</strong>ir e-commerce activities are digitally <strong>in</strong>tegrated processes, or whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong>y use ra<strong>the</strong>r "simple" forms of e-commerce, such as receiv<strong>in</strong>g orders by e-mail without<br />

any system <strong>in</strong>tegration of <strong>the</strong> related <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> document flow.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> P&P <strong>in</strong>dustry, more than 10% of firms (represent<strong>in</strong>g close to 20% of sector<br />

employment) reported <strong>the</strong> use of software solutions or <strong>in</strong>ternet-based services for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sales activities (see Exhibit 3-29). This shows that, <strong>in</strong> fact, <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

considerable gap between <strong>the</strong> percentage of companies receiv<strong>in</strong>g at least some orders<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e (~30%) <strong>and</strong> those that have special software for do<strong>in</strong>g so (~10%). The percentage<br />

is much closer to <strong>the</strong> one for ERP adoption (16%). In essence, <strong>the</strong> systematic management<br />

of onl<strong>in</strong>e orders will <strong>in</strong> many cases be conducted via <strong>the</strong> ERP system of a company.<br />

Those companies which have specific sales systems <strong>in</strong> place tend to use <strong>the</strong>m ma<strong>in</strong>ly for<br />

<strong>the</strong> core functions of publish<strong>in</strong>g offers to customers (62%), for enabl<strong>in</strong>g customers to<br />

place orders (74%) <strong>and</strong> also for answer<strong>in</strong>g calls for tender (57%). Only one <strong>in</strong> five<br />

companies with such systems also enable customers to actually pay onl<strong>in</strong>e for <strong>the</strong> goods<br />

which <strong>the</strong>y have ordered. The latter <strong>in</strong>cidence shows how important it is to make a<br />

difference between <strong>the</strong> various phases <strong>in</strong> e-commerce transactions when analys<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

topic. Enabl<strong>in</strong>g customers to place an onl<strong>in</strong>e order is <strong>in</strong> many cases still separated from<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!