Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ECONOMIC THREATS TO SECURITY<br />
Table 4.2 The top ten famines in history<br />
Deaths<br />
Principal cause<br />
1 China 1958–62 30 million a Political – forced urbanization and collectivization<br />
of agriculture<br />
2 N. China 1876–78 12 million b Natural – drought<br />
3 Bengal 1770 10 million c Natural – drought<br />
4 C. India 1876–78 6 million b Natural – drought<br />
5 Ukraine 1932–33 5 million d Political – harsh USSR quotas on Ukrainian grain<br />
collected centrally<br />
6 N. Korea 1995– 2 million e Natural – drought and floods<br />
7 Bengal 1943–44 1.9 million d Political – supply and price of rice negatively<br />
affected by Second World War<br />
8 Rajputana, India 1869 1.5 million f Natural – drought<br />
=9 Orissa, India 1865–66 1 million f Natural – drought in 1865 followed by floods in<br />
1866<br />
=9 India 1897 1 million f Natural – drought<br />
=9 Ireland 1845–47 1 million g Natural – potato blight<br />
Sources: a Becker (2000), b Davis (2001), c Sen (1981), d Disaster Center (2002), e Natsios (1999), f Hazlitt<br />
(1973), g O’Grada (1999).<br />
drought and flooding, which are considered elsewhere in this book. Floods and<br />
droughts wipe out crops and can cause famine but they can also kill directly, while<br />
diseases are generally more virulent when infecting a malnourished population.<br />
Hence, determining the precise cause of death for peoples beset by such natural<br />
catastrophes is problematic and, as such, figures on famine fatalities are inexact.<br />
Second, even allowing for the blurring of the causal factors of death, disaster mortality<br />
statistics are notoriously unreliable. Governments tend to underestimate figures,<br />
while anti-government voices often exaggerate them for opposing political purposes.<br />
Most of the figures quoted in the table are contested and it is difficult to verify precise<br />
totals even with painstaking research. This problem is not solely one of authenticating<br />
historical records, modern-day statistics also tend to be arrived at through educated<br />
guesswork. The highly secretive North Korean government denied any problem<br />
of starvation for a number of years and have subsequently admitted to ‘only’ around<br />
200,000 deaths due to this. Natsios’ estimate of 2–3 million is largely derived from<br />
making extrapolations based on interviews with refugees. The true picture will<br />
probably never be known.<br />
The causes of famine<br />
A further abstraction used in Table 4.2 is in indicating the principal cause of each<br />
famine. There is usually a combination of factors which explain such humanitarian<br />
disasters. As with the mortality figures, the causes of famines are frequently disputed<br />
by analysts and politicians. Most famines are the result of a combination of both<br />
86