27.02.2014 Views

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NATURAL THREATS TO SECURITY<br />

The International Decade for Natural<br />

Disaster Reduction (IDNDR)<br />

The 1990s were designated as the International Decade for Natural Disaster<br />

Reduction by UN General Assembly Resolution 46/182 in 1989, following the<br />

recommendation of a specially commissioned ad hoc group of experts. The decade<br />

inspired unprecedented levels of international cooperation in this policy area and<br />

the formation or deepening of numerous epistemic communities for particular<br />

disaster forms. The decade also, however, witnessed an upsurge in the number of<br />

fatalities from natural disasters, which served to illustrate that transnational scientific<br />

cooperation, though welcome, was not enough.<br />

The IDNDR approach was largely technical and vertical. A number of sectoral<br />

initiatives were launched such as the Global Fire Monitoring Centre, Tsunami<br />

Inundation Modelling Exchange Programme and Tropical Cyclone Programme<br />

which improved transnational early warning capacities. A number of pilot studies<br />

were also activated during the decade by coordinating the work of existing international<br />

organizations. UNEP, WHO and the World Meterological Organization<br />

(WMO) collaborated in trial runs for a Heat/Health Warning System to better<br />

anticipate extreme weather. The International Association of Vulcanology and<br />

Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI) instigated a scheme monitoring 16<br />

active volcanoes to assess how public awareness of the various hazards could be<br />

improved.<br />

The arch ‘horizontalist’ Ben Wisner says of the decade: ‘Science was exchanged<br />

all right, but generally it has not been applied’ (Wisner 2000). This view is echoed by<br />

Britton:<br />

There is little doubt that IDNDR was effective in encouraging nations to focus<br />

attention on the threat posed by natural hazards and in creating an environment<br />

wherein greater international colaboration was fostered. Nevertheless, the<br />

fundamental task of reducing societal consequences of disaster reduction<br />

remained.<br />

(Britton 2001: 45)<br />

The Secretariat of the IDNDR itself admitted: ‘The application of science and<br />

technology was recognized as being essential for reducing the risk of natural<br />

disasters, but in the early years of the decade, it became evident that this was not<br />

sufficient by itself’ (Jeggle 1999: 24).<br />

The International Strategy for Disaster<br />

Reduction (ISDR)<br />

To continue the work undertaken under the IDNDR a successor UN body was<br />

established in 1999 and launched in 2000. The ISDR was adopted at the 1999 IDNDR<br />

Programme Forum and then ratified by both the UN General Assembly (54/219,<br />

22 December 1999) and ECOSOC (E/1999/63, 30 July 1999). The ISDR has a small<br />

secretariat based in Geneva under the authority of the Under-Secretary-General for<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!