27.02.2014 Views

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NATURAL THREATS TO SECURITY<br />

Humanitarian Affairs and a policy-making body, the Inter-Agency Task Force on<br />

Disaster Reduction (IATF/DR), chaired by the same person.<br />

The ISDR declare that their overriding aim is: ‘To enable all societies to become<br />

resilient to the effects of natural hazards and related technological and environmental<br />

disasters, in order to reduce human, economic and social losses’ (ISDR 2002a: 1).<br />

This aim is to be achieved in four ways: (1) stimulating public awareness,<br />

(2) obtaining the commitment of public authorities, (3) promoting interdisciplinary<br />

cooperation and (4) fostering greater scientific knowledge (ISDR 2002a: 2).<br />

The ISDR has incorporated more horizontal, mitigation-based approaches in<br />

its overall strategy than was the case with its predecessor. ‘Vulnerability to disasters<br />

should be considered in a broad context encompassing specific human, social/<br />

cultural, economic, environmental and political dimensions, that relate to inequalities,<br />

gender relations and ethical and racial divisions’ (ISDR 2002b: 21).<br />

Political initiatives for protecting the earth against<br />

extra-terrestrial collisions<br />

Surveillance of the night sky for early detection of NEOs has increased since the<br />

launch of the ‘Spaceguard’ initiative by NASA in the early 1990s and its subsequent<br />

linking up with other national schemes. What could be done if an NEO was set for<br />

collision with the earth remains to be established, however. Military solutions have<br />

figured prominently in discussions. The possibility of deflecting or destroying<br />

an NEO by nuclear strike has been aired regularly, particularly in the USA, the state<br />

most likely to be able to attempt such an action. Other, non-military suggestions<br />

for defending the earth from such collisions are more surreal still. Lempit Opik, the<br />

leading spokesman in the UK parliament on this topic (see Box 8.1), has proposed:<br />

‘You could have a big plastic condom or space sheath to collect near-Earth objects<br />

and tow them to safety’ (Brown and Goodchild 2000).<br />

Box 8.1 Lembit Opik<br />

In the UK no one has done more to highlight the need to act to avert the potential<br />

disaster of an asteroid or comet colliding with the earth than the colourful Member of<br />

Parliament (MP) Lembit Opik. Opik is an unusual British politician in many ways.<br />

Despite being born and bred in Northern Ireland he bypassed sectarian politics<br />

in becoming a maverick Liberal Democrat MP with a seat in rural Wales, while<br />

maintaining a role in the peace process going on in his homeland. His family<br />

background would certainly appear to have influenced him politically. The Opiks<br />

emigrated to Northern Ireland from Estonia to flee brutal Soviet persecution, making<br />

a commitment to Liberalism easy to understand. More particularly, Opik’s grandfather<br />

was an astronomer who, on taking up a post at Armagh University after migrating,<br />

became active in research on asteroids and the potential dangers they posed to<br />

humanity.<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!