Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SOCIAL IDENTITY AS A THREAT TO SECURITY<br />
Table 5.6 Regional human rights regimes<br />
Regime Year began Membership Political impact<br />
European Convention 1953 Most of Europe Commission and Court able to make<br />
supranational verdicts. Individual<br />
petition possible<br />
Banjul Charter 1981 Most of Africa Commission promotes human rights<br />
but there is no implementing body<br />
Inter-American 1978 N. & S. America Commission and Court but has little<br />
Convention<br />
influence.<br />
Arab Commission 1968 Arab states of No Convention developed. Speaks<br />
Middle East out on Arab rights in Israel<br />
The Commonwealth 1931 Former British Has suspended membership and<br />
colonies<br />
imposed political sanctions on<br />
member states for human rights<br />
abuses<br />
rights riding roughshod over the minority cultures of the world prompted leading<br />
anthropologists, including Melville Herskovits and Ruth Benedict, to petition the UN<br />
Commission for Human Rights.<br />
Standards and values are relative to the culture from which they derive so that<br />
any attempt to formulate postulates that grow out of the beliefs or moral codes<br />
of one culture must to that extent detract from the applicability of any<br />
Declaration of Human Rights to mankind as a whole.<br />
(American Anthropologist Association 1947: 542)<br />
In Benedict’s view, and that of most traditional anthropologists, the notion of<br />
what is morally right can only equate to what is customary within a given society<br />
(Benedict 1934). Hence the notion of rights pertaining to all humankind is not ‘natural’.<br />
Rights are the rules of mutual give and take which develop over time within a society<br />
in order for it to function peacefully and survive. Rights are, in effect, implicit agreements<br />
arrived at within societies. The American Anthropological Association (AAA),<br />
as a counter to criticisms from human rights activists that they and their discipline<br />
was immoral, issued a declaration in 1999 giving qualified support for UN human<br />
rights legislation. The AAA now argue that human rights are ‘an evolving concept’<br />
and that they have come to see <strong>global</strong> policy as a way of campaigning to preserve<br />
human cultural difference (AAA 1999). Anthropology as a discipline, however,<br />
continues to be very influenced by the positivist epistemological belief that value<br />
judgements over cultures other than one’s own are an imposition of those values.<br />
In contemporary philosophy perhaps the leading exponent of relativism is<br />
Gilbert Harman, whose writings may have influenced Zemin since he argues the<br />
128