27.02.2014 Views

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIAL IDENTITY AS A THREAT TO SECURITY<br />

Table 5.6 Regional human rights regimes<br />

Regime Year began Membership Political impact<br />

European Convention 1953 Most of Europe Commission and Court able to make<br />

supranational verdicts. Individual<br />

petition possible<br />

Banjul Charter 1981 Most of Africa Commission promotes human rights<br />

but there is no implementing body<br />

Inter-American 1978 N. & S. America Commission and Court but has little<br />

Convention<br />

influence.<br />

Arab Commission 1968 Arab states of No Convention developed. Speaks<br />

Middle East out on Arab rights in Israel<br />

The Commonwealth 1931 Former British Has suspended membership and<br />

colonies<br />

imposed political sanctions on<br />

member states for human rights<br />

abuses<br />

rights riding roughshod over the minority cultures of the world prompted leading<br />

anthropologists, including Melville Herskovits and Ruth Benedict, to petition the UN<br />

Commission for Human Rights.<br />

Standards and values are relative to the culture from which they derive so that<br />

any attempt to formulate postulates that grow out of the beliefs or moral codes<br />

of one culture must to that extent detract from the applicability of any<br />

Declaration of Human Rights to mankind as a whole.<br />

(American Anthropologist Association 1947: 542)<br />

In Benedict’s view, and that of most traditional anthropologists, the notion of<br />

what is morally right can only equate to what is customary within a given society<br />

(Benedict 1934). Hence the notion of rights pertaining to all humankind is not ‘natural’.<br />

Rights are the rules of mutual give and take which develop over time within a society<br />

in order for it to function peacefully and survive. Rights are, in effect, implicit agreements<br />

arrived at within societies. The American Anthropological Association (AAA),<br />

as a counter to criticisms from human rights activists that they and their discipline<br />

was immoral, issued a declaration in 1999 giving qualified support for UN human<br />

rights legislation. The AAA now argue that human rights are ‘an evolving concept’<br />

and that they have come to see <strong>global</strong> policy as a way of campaigning to preserve<br />

human cultural difference (AAA 1999). Anthropology as a discipline, however,<br />

continues to be very influenced by the positivist epistemological belief that value<br />

judgements over cultures other than one’s own are an imposition of those values.<br />

In contemporary philosophy perhaps the leading exponent of relativism is<br />

Gilbert Harman, whose writings may have influenced Zemin since he argues the<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!