Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ECONOMIC THREATS TO SECURITY<br />
Box 4.1 Amartya Sen<br />
The winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1998, Sen is an Indian academic<br />
from Bengal who experienced the 1943–44 famine first hand as a young boy. He was<br />
born on a university campus to Bangladeshi parents (his father was a Chemistry<br />
lecturer) and has graced most of the leading universities of the world in a glittering<br />
academic career. Sen has lectured in Economics at Cambridge, Oxford, the London<br />
School of Economics and Harvard and his research has focused on the economic<br />
dimensions of poverty, famine and human rights. As such Sen’s work has found<br />
influence outside of the confines of Economics and he is revered in political science<br />
for his contribution to bringing a much neglected ethical dimension to the ‘miserable<br />
science’.<br />
Democratic governments are compelled to be responsive to the needs of ordinary<br />
people whose <strong>security</strong> is imperilled, whether directly or indirectly through the<br />
pressure of the media or other concerned citizens, in a way in which tyrannical<br />
dictators or neglectful colonialists are not. Democracy saves people as well as<br />
empowers them and the spread of democratization in the world will help in the fight<br />
against famine. Food shortages will still occur from time to time but these can<br />
normally be planned for by governments and when they cannot be dealt with the<br />
international community can step in. Countless lives in North Korea would have been<br />
saved were it not for the fact that the state has cut itself off from the rest of the world<br />
and proper help has not been possible. Being part of the <strong>global</strong> economy would have<br />
saved the lives of many North Koreans. Being a democratic state within the <strong>global</strong><br />
economy would have saved more still.<br />
Global policy on famine relief<br />
The principal instrument for coordinating famine relief at <strong>global</strong> level is the UN’s<br />
World Food Programme (WFP) a hybrid of the Food and Agricultural Organization<br />
(FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). Created in 1963, initially as an ad<br />
hoc three-year project, the WFP has evolved into the ‘food arm of the UN’ (WFP<br />
2002a: 1) with all of the characteristics of an IGO. Based, like the FAO, in Rome, the<br />
WFP is governed by an executive board and served by a permanent secretariat. The<br />
executive board votes on where to allocate food aid from an annual budget of around<br />
$1.5 billion. Through the course of its working life this food aid has increasingly been<br />
targeted at countries suffering food shortages, due to the effects of natural disasters<br />
or conflict rather than for general development purposes (see Figure 4.1).<br />
The stated aim of the WFP’s work is ‘eradicating hunger and poverty. The<br />
ultimate objective of food aid should be the elimination of the need for food aid’ (WFP<br />
2002b: 1). In reality, though, the WFP is a <strong>global</strong> emergency service and the broad<br />
aim of achieving ‘food <strong>security</strong>’ – ‘access of all peoples at all times to the food needed<br />
for an active and healthy life’ (FAO/WHO 1992) – is a more profound goal beyond<br />
the beyond the reach of its budget and operations.<br />
89