27.02.2014 Views

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ECONOMIC THREATS TO SECURITY<br />

Box 4.1 Amartya Sen<br />

The winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1998, Sen is an Indian academic<br />

from Bengal who experienced the 1943–44 famine first hand as a young boy. He was<br />

born on a university campus to Bangladeshi parents (his father was a Chemistry<br />

lecturer) and has graced most of the leading universities of the world in a glittering<br />

academic career. Sen has lectured in Economics at Cambridge, Oxford, the London<br />

School of Economics and Harvard and his research has focused on the economic<br />

dimensions of poverty, famine and human rights. As such Sen’s work has found<br />

influence outside of the confines of Economics and he is revered in political science<br />

for his contribution to bringing a much neglected ethical dimension to the ‘miserable<br />

science’.<br />

Democratic governments are compelled to be responsive to the needs of ordinary<br />

people whose <strong>security</strong> is imperilled, whether directly or indirectly through the<br />

pressure of the media or other concerned citizens, in a way in which tyrannical<br />

dictators or neglectful colonialists are not. Democracy saves people as well as<br />

empowers them and the spread of democratization in the world will help in the fight<br />

against famine. Food shortages will still occur from time to time but these can<br />

normally be planned for by governments and when they cannot be dealt with the<br />

international community can step in. Countless lives in North Korea would have been<br />

saved were it not for the fact that the state has cut itself off from the rest of the world<br />

and proper help has not been possible. Being part of the <strong>global</strong> economy would have<br />

saved the lives of many North Koreans. Being a democratic state within the <strong>global</strong><br />

economy would have saved more still.<br />

Global policy on famine relief<br />

The principal instrument for coordinating famine relief at <strong>global</strong> level is the UN’s<br />

World Food Programme (WFP) a hybrid of the Food and Agricultural Organization<br />

(FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). Created in 1963, initially as an ad<br />

hoc three-year project, the WFP has evolved into the ‘food arm of the UN’ (WFP<br />

2002a: 1) with all of the characteristics of an IGO. Based, like the FAO, in Rome, the<br />

WFP is governed by an executive board and served by a permanent secretariat. The<br />

executive board votes on where to allocate food aid from an annual budget of around<br />

$1.5 billion. Through the course of its working life this food aid has increasingly been<br />

targeted at countries suffering food shortages, due to the effects of natural disasters<br />

or conflict rather than for general development purposes (see Figure 4.1).<br />

The stated aim of the WFP’s work is ‘eradicating hunger and poverty. The<br />

ultimate objective of food aid should be the elimination of the need for food aid’ (WFP<br />

2002b: 1). In reality, though, the WFP is a <strong>global</strong> emergency service and the broad<br />

aim of achieving ‘food <strong>security</strong>’ – ‘access of all peoples at all times to the food needed<br />

for an active and healthy life’ (FAO/WHO 1992) – is a more profound goal beyond<br />

the beyond the reach of its budget and operations.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!