27.02.2014 Views

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECURITY AND SECURITIZATION<br />

Table 1.1 Fears of individuals living in the European Union in 2000 (%) a<br />

1 Organized crime 77<br />

2 Nuclear power plant accident 75<br />

3 Terrorism 74<br />

4 Ethnic conflict 65<br />

5 Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction 62<br />

6 Epidemics 57<br />

7 Accidental launch of nuclear weapon 55<br />

8 World war 45<br />

9 Conventional war 45<br />

10 Nuclear conflict 44<br />

Note: a 15,900 people across the 15 EU member states in November and December 2000 were asked<br />

the following question: ‘Here is a list of things that some people are afraid of. For each of these, please<br />

tell me if, personally, you are afraid of it or not’.<br />

Source: Manigart (2001: 4–5).<br />

War (see Table 1.1). It is also observable in various ways that the international political<br />

agenda has become far more diverse since 1990, with governments giving greater<br />

priority to issues such as environmental threats, drugs and public health. Even<br />

explicitly military organizations, like NATO, are increasingly focusing on non-military<br />

activities.<br />

Who’s securing whom?<br />

The preoccupation of Security Studies with the state is very much a relic of the Cold<br />

War. In some ways this is understandable since the discipline of International<br />

Relations, and its sub-discipline Security Studies, only emerged in the 1930s and<br />

was thus very much forged in an era of unprecedented military threats. Realism was<br />

in the ascendancy at the close of the Second World War since the application of<br />

force had proved its worth in curbing aggression and restoring order in Europe and<br />

Asia. Pre-Second World War international cooperation, in the form of the League<br />

of Nations, and ‘softly-softly’ appeasement diplomacy vis-à-vis aggressors comprehensively<br />

failed to keep the peace. In addition, the total war of the Second World<br />

War and the ‘total phoney war’ of the Cold War, whereby whole populations were<br />

threatened by state quarrels in an unprecedented way, bound individuals to the fates<br />

of their governments like never before.<br />

Hence in the 1940s the twin concepts of ‘national interest’ and ‘national <strong>security</strong>’<br />

took centre stage in International Relations and Security Studies. Walter Lippmann,<br />

an American journalist who popularized the term ‘Cold War’ also defined the nature<br />

of <strong>security</strong> that would characterize that era. ‘A nation has <strong>security</strong> when it does<br />

not have to sacrifice its legitimate interests to avoid war and is able, if challenged,<br />

to maintain them by war’ (Lippmann 1943: 32). The USA’s new pre-eminence and<br />

preparedness to act on the world stage in 1945 was an additional key factor in<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!