Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ECONOMIC THREATS TO SECURITY<br />
statecentricism in the pursuit of human <strong>security</strong>. Globalization, if driven purely by the<br />
economic interests of some states, can represent a threat to much of the world, but<br />
a more fully rounded form of <strong>global</strong>ization, with a social and political dimension, can<br />
do much to enhance human <strong>security</strong>.<br />
Key points<br />
• Poverty is both a major direct threat to life, as a cause of famine and hunger, and<br />
a major indirect threat to life, since it heightens vulnerability to other threats.<br />
• Famines usually have natural triggers but, ultimately, are man-made phenomena<br />
since they are sometimes politically motivated and nearly always politically<br />
avoidable.<br />
• Famines are high-profile peaks of suffering dwarfed by the general, persisitent<br />
threat of hunger.<br />
• Hunger is avoidable since there is sufficient food in the world for all people but<br />
remains a major problem due to <strong>global</strong> political failings which can, variably, be<br />
attributed to negligence or wilful exploitation in the <strong>global</strong> North or the failure<br />
to modernize in the <strong>global</strong> South.<br />
• Life-threatening societal poverty may also occur as a result of economic<br />
sanctions targeting governments, though the development of ‘smart’ sanctions,<br />
more focused on the governments, is lessening this side-effect.<br />
• Economic <strong>security</strong> from an Economic Liberal perspective is best achieved by<br />
more <strong>global</strong>ization, from a Mercantilist perspective by less <strong>global</strong>ization, and<br />
from a Marxist perspective by radical <strong>global</strong> change.<br />
Notes<br />
1 Malnutrition defined by the WFP as a daily intake of below 1800 calories, with 2100<br />
being the recommended intake.<br />
2 The NAM was obstensively an organization of states declaring themselves to be aligned<br />
to neither Cold War superpower but became a vehicle of ‘Third World’ solidarity.<br />
Recommended reading<br />
Frank, A.G. (1971) Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, Harmondsworth:<br />
Penguin.<br />
Galtung, J. (1969) ‘Violence, Peace and Peace Research’, Journal of Peace Research 6(3):<br />
167–191.<br />
ICIDI (1980) North–South: The Report of the International Commission on International<br />
Development Issues, London: Pan Books.<br />
Lopez, G. and Cortright, D. (2002) ‘Smarting Under Sanctions’, The World Today, 58(3) March:<br />
17–18.<br />
Rostow, W. (1960) The Stages of Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Sen, A. (1981) Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford:<br />
Clarendon Press.<br />
Thomas, C. (2000) Global Governance, Development and Human Security, London: Pluto Press.<br />
102