27.02.2014 Views

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SOCIAL IDENTITY AS A THREAT TO SECURITY<br />

overpopulation has prompted government measures to restrict the number of<br />

children per family. Although the scale of this phenomenon is uncertain, and the<br />

ethics of killing unborn infants unproblematic for many, it is clear that hundreds of<br />

thousands of female lives are not lived every year as a result. Rummel is unequivocal<br />

in ranking this phenomenon alongside other, better-recognized human <strong>security</strong><br />

threats.<br />

the accumulation of such officially sanctioned or demanded murders comprises,<br />

in effect, serial massacre. Since such practices were so pervasive in<br />

some cultures, I suspect that the death toll from infanticide must exceed that<br />

from mass sacrifice and perhaps even outright mass murder.<br />

(Rummel 1994: 65–66)<br />

Baby girls in a number of countries are frequently murdered soon after birth,<br />

usually by starvation or wilful neglect when ill, while ultrasound scans of pregnant<br />

women also make gender-based abortions increasingly common. In China, where<br />

families with more than one child are strongly ‘discouraged’, the 2002 population<br />

census revealed a sex imbalance of 116 males to every 100 females. The disparity<br />

was as high as 135 to 100 on the island of Hainan (Gittings 2002). The Chinese government’s<br />

alarm at the social effects of such an imbalance prompted them to restrict the<br />

availability of ultrasound scans, meaning that infanticide must now be the major<br />

explanation for the disparity.<br />

The fact that an individual’s sex can be the source of their in<strong>security</strong> cannot<br />

be seen more clearly than in them being fatally discriminated against before even<br />

being able to live their life. During a woman’s lifetime, sex-based domestic violence<br />

remains a significant threat. It has been estimated that half of the women in the world<br />

who are murdered are killed by male partners (Krug et al. 2002). The inaccuracy of<br />

the conventional externalizing of <strong>security</strong> threats is never more apparent than in this<br />

instance, where the threat comes not only from within the individual’s own country<br />

but from within her own, immediate family.<br />

It is important to note, however, that the victims of ‘gendercide’ are not always<br />

women. In both inter-state and intra-state war the systematic culling of men ‘of<br />

fighting age’ among enemy non-combatants has long been a military tactic. The mass<br />

killing of potential soldiers was a feature of the early German campaign in the USSR<br />

in the Second World War and was evident in the Serb massacres of Kosovar Albanians<br />

in the run-up and duration of the 1999 Kosovan War (Jones 2000). Additionally, it<br />

is males who form the bulk of war casualties, as they do of criminal murders and<br />

industrial accidents. It is a paradox of human life that it is far safer to be born a boy<br />

but grow up as a woman.<br />

Sexual orientation<br />

Aside from nationality, ethnicity, religion and gender, a further form of identity<br />

subject to life-threatening discrimination is homosexuality. Many people have been<br />

killed and continue to be killed purely on the grounds that they practise consensual<br />

sexual activities with other people of the same sex. Homosexuals were targeted<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!