Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Understanding global security - Peter Hough
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ECONOMIC THREATS TO SECURITY<br />
1990: 92–93). Cuba, however, has undoubtedly suffered from the continuation of US<br />
sanctions in the last decade owing to the size and proximity of their foe and the fall<br />
of their chief economic ally during the Cold War, the USSR.<br />
In most cases the economic <strong>security</strong> of states and their peoples is only likely<br />
to be threatened by <strong>global</strong> economic action, depriving them of any legitimate trading<br />
partners. Economic sanctions were an option open to the League of Nations, for the<br />
purpose of deterring aggression, but were only ever used in a limited and symbolic<br />
manner owing to a lack of resolve among its member states. Fascist Italy’s invasion<br />
of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) in 1935 prompted only meek measures which, crucially,<br />
did not include an oil embargo. The League was hampered by the UK and France’s<br />
reluctance to antagonize Italy too greatly through fear of war and by the fact that<br />
many significant economic powers, such as the USA and Germany, were not members<br />
and so not obliged to follow suit.<br />
The collective imposition of economic sanctions originated in the 1960s under<br />
the auspices of the UN Security Council, empowered by Article 41 of the UN Charter<br />
to act against threats to international peace and <strong>security</strong>. The significance of Security<br />
Council backed sanctions is that they become binding on all UN members, whether<br />
they individually support the measure or not. Bearing in mind the limited operation<br />
of collective <strong>security</strong>, UN sanctions represent the most significant example of <strong>global</strong><br />
supranational policy seen to date.<br />
The success of UN economic sanctions as a means of conducting coercive<br />
diplomacy is not easy to judge. As Table 4.3 illustrates, the use of economic sanctions<br />
has increased greatly since the end of the Cold War but they are often controversial<br />
and, some feel, counter-productive. Criticisms levelled at the use of comprehensive<br />
economic sanctions include the following.<br />
Table 4.3 Mandatory UN economic sanctions<br />
Rhodesia1966–79<br />
South Africa1977–94<br />
Iraq 1990–<br />
Yugoslavia<br />
1991–95 (arms embargo applied to successor states on<br />
break up)<br />
Libya1992–<br />
Fed. Rep. of Yugoslavia 1992–95<br />
Somalia 1992–<br />
Liberia1992<br />
Haiti 1993–94<br />
UNITA 1993<br />
Rwanda<br />
1994–96 (but arms embargo on Rwandan NGOs<br />
remains)<br />
Bosnian Serb Party 1994–96<br />
Sudan 1996<br />
Sierra Leone 1997<br />
Afghanistan 2001<br />
al-Qa’ida 2001<br />
96