27.02.2014 Views

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

Understanding global security - Peter Hough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECONOMIC THREATS TO SECURITY<br />

1990: 92–93). Cuba, however, has undoubtedly suffered from the continuation of US<br />

sanctions in the last decade owing to the size and proximity of their foe and the fall<br />

of their chief economic ally during the Cold War, the USSR.<br />

In most cases the economic <strong>security</strong> of states and their peoples is only likely<br />

to be threatened by <strong>global</strong> economic action, depriving them of any legitimate trading<br />

partners. Economic sanctions were an option open to the League of Nations, for the<br />

purpose of deterring aggression, but were only ever used in a limited and symbolic<br />

manner owing to a lack of resolve among its member states. Fascist Italy’s invasion<br />

of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) in 1935 prompted only meek measures which, crucially,<br />

did not include an oil embargo. The League was hampered by the UK and France’s<br />

reluctance to antagonize Italy too greatly through fear of war and by the fact that<br />

many significant economic powers, such as the USA and Germany, were not members<br />

and so not obliged to follow suit.<br />

The collective imposition of economic sanctions originated in the 1960s under<br />

the auspices of the UN Security Council, empowered by Article 41 of the UN Charter<br />

to act against threats to international peace and <strong>security</strong>. The significance of Security<br />

Council backed sanctions is that they become binding on all UN members, whether<br />

they individually support the measure or not. Bearing in mind the limited operation<br />

of collective <strong>security</strong>, UN sanctions represent the most significant example of <strong>global</strong><br />

supranational policy seen to date.<br />

The success of UN economic sanctions as a means of conducting coercive<br />

diplomacy is not easy to judge. As Table 4.3 illustrates, the use of economic sanctions<br />

has increased greatly since the end of the Cold War but they are often controversial<br />

and, some feel, counter-productive. Criticisms levelled at the use of comprehensive<br />

economic sanctions include the following.<br />

Table 4.3 Mandatory UN economic sanctions<br />

Rhodesia1966–79<br />

South Africa1977–94<br />

Iraq 1990–<br />

Yugoslavia<br />

1991–95 (arms embargo applied to successor states on<br />

break up)<br />

Libya1992–<br />

Fed. Rep. of Yugoslavia 1992–95<br />

Somalia 1992–<br />

Liberia1992<br />

Haiti 1993–94<br />

UNITA 1993<br />

Rwanda<br />

1994–96 (but arms embargo on Rwandan NGOs<br />

remains)<br />

Bosnian Serb Party 1994–96<br />

Sudan 1996<br />

Sierra Leone 1997<br />

Afghanistan 2001<br />

al-Qa’ida 2001<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!