13.04.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xii<br />

if a beneficiary obtains earnings <strong>of</strong> at least <strong>the</strong> substantial gainful activity level (currently set<br />

at $810 per month for most beneficiaries) for nine months. Both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new payment<br />

options give providers a substantially stronger performance incentive because <strong>the</strong>y require a<br />

beneficiary <strong>to</strong> exit cash benefit status by reason <strong>of</strong> increased earnings for 60 months before<br />

<strong>the</strong> provider receives full payment. Of <strong>the</strong> two new systems, <strong>the</strong> first option, <strong>the</strong> “outcome<br />

payment” system, provides higher payments but only when a beneficiary leaves <strong>the</strong> rolls due<br />

<strong>to</strong> work or earnings. The o<strong>the</strong>r new option, <strong>the</strong> “miles<strong>to</strong>ne-outcome” system, provides<br />

smaller outcome payments, but can also provide up <strong>to</strong> four larger miles<strong>to</strong>ne payments while<br />

a beneficiary is still receiving benefits, if <strong>the</strong> beneficiary achieves specified earnings targets.<br />

TTW increases <strong>the</strong> choices given <strong>to</strong> beneficiaries who voluntarily decide <strong>to</strong> pursue<br />

employment. It does so by greatly expanding <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> organizations that SSA will pay <strong>to</strong><br />

assist beneficiaries’ work efforts. In addition <strong>to</strong> SVRA’s <strong>the</strong>se organizations include a range<br />

<strong>of</strong> public and private providers, called employment networks (ENs), that have signed a<br />

contract with SSA. In addition, TTW gives service providers and beneficiaries considerable<br />

flexibility in choosing <strong>the</strong> services that will be provided. In fact, providers and beneficiaries<br />

must agree on an individualized work plan before a <strong>Ticket</strong> can be put in<strong>to</strong> use. This plan<br />

could, in <strong>the</strong>ory, include a wide array <strong>of</strong> services designed <strong>to</strong> help beneficiaries overcome<br />

barriers related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> service system and <strong>the</strong> labor market, <strong>the</strong>ir need for<br />

new or enhanced job skills, and even employer misperceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir abilities.<br />

Service delivery in TTW is constrained, however, by providers’ desire <strong>to</strong> limit service<br />

expenditures <strong>to</strong> a level that fits within <strong>the</strong> payments <strong>the</strong>y expect <strong>to</strong> receive and by <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> services <strong>the</strong>y can provide are likely <strong>to</strong> result in a beneficiary<br />

leaving <strong>the</strong> rolls. In fact, providers can refuse <strong>to</strong> serve beneficiaries whom <strong>the</strong>y think have a<br />

low probability <strong>of</strong> leaving <strong>the</strong> rolls due <strong>to</strong> work (and <strong>the</strong>refore not triggering outcome<br />

payments). Beneficiaries who only want <strong>to</strong> work at an earnings level that would enable <strong>the</strong>m<br />

<strong>to</strong> retain part or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir benefits will generally not be attractive clients <strong>to</strong> providers.<br />

TTW is being implemented in three phases. In Phase 1, which began in February 2002,<br />

<strong>the</strong> program was rolled out in 13 states across <strong>the</strong> country. Phase 2 began in November<br />

2002 and extended <strong>the</strong> program <strong>to</strong> an additional 20 states plus <strong>the</strong> District <strong>of</strong> Columbia.<br />

Phase 3, which began in November 2003, will see TTW implemented in <strong>the</strong> remaining 17<br />

states and U.S. terri<strong>to</strong>ries.<br />

MAJOR FINDINGS<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> first major report from SSA’s TTW evaluation. Drawing on information<br />

collected during just <strong>the</strong> first five months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study, it examines early implementation<br />

issues and sets <strong>the</strong> stage for <strong>the</strong> more comprehensive reports <strong>to</strong> follow. In particular, this<br />

report is based on <strong>the</strong> preliminary process analysis (Livermore et al. 2003) and our interviews<br />

with staff at SSA, <strong>the</strong> TTW <strong>Program</strong> Manager, and several ENs and SVRAs. We also<br />

present findings on enrollment and participation patterns from our early analysis <strong>of</strong> TTW<br />

administrative data.<br />

Executive Summary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!