13.04.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78<br />

• Almost 40 percent <strong>of</strong> eligible beneficiaries have been receiving benefits for 10<br />

or more years, and only 11 percent have been receiving benefits for 2 or fewer<br />

years.<br />

• SSA lists a psychiatric disorder as <strong>the</strong> primary impairment for about onequarter<br />

<strong>of</strong> eligible beneficiaries (27 percent in Phase 1, 23 percent in Phase 2).<br />

Musculoskeletal impairment is listed for ano<strong>the</strong>r 17 percent in both phases, and<br />

mental retardation is listed for over 10 percent (11 in Phase 1 and 14 in Phase<br />

2). SSA lists fewer than 10 percent <strong>of</strong> eligible beneficiaries as being in each <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> remaining impairment categories.<br />

One measurable way in which beneficiaries in <strong>the</strong> two Phases differ is in <strong>the</strong>ir preference for<br />

receiving notices from SSA in Spanish. Just 1 percent <strong>of</strong> beneficiaries in Phase 2 states<br />

prefer Spanish <strong>to</strong> English versus 4 percent in <strong>the</strong> Phase 1 states. This difference reflects <strong>the</strong><br />

inclusion <strong>of</strong> Florida and New York in Phase 1 and <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> any state with a<br />

comparably large Hispanic population in Phase 2.<br />

2. Variation in Participation Rates<br />

To understand <strong>the</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs that drive participation, we estimated participation rates for<br />

several subgroups <strong>of</strong> Phase 1 participants. We focus on Phase 1 states because <strong>the</strong> states’<br />

earlier rollout has given beneficiaries a longer chance <strong>to</strong> participate. The subgroups are<br />

defined by beneficiaries’ characteristics (including demographics and primary disabling<br />

conditions) and by <strong>the</strong>ir state <strong>of</strong> residence. Readers are cautioned that <strong>the</strong>se simple crosstabulations<br />

may mask <strong>the</strong> true determinants <strong>of</strong> participation because <strong>of</strong> covariation among<br />

characteristics. In a subsequent report, we will use more sophisticated analysis methods <strong>to</strong><br />

study <strong>the</strong> relationships between participation and individual characteristics, holding o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

characteristics constant.<br />

The most interesting finding from this analysis is that a few major subgroups participate<br />

at rates substantially higher or lower than <strong>the</strong> overall 0.7 percent rate. For example, young<br />

beneficiaries participate at higher rates than older beneficiaries. Those in <strong>the</strong> youngest age<br />

group (ages 18 <strong>to</strong> 24) have a participation rate <strong>of</strong> 2 percent in <strong>the</strong> Phase 1 states (Figure<br />

IV.8); however, <strong>the</strong> participation rate declines steadily with age and is only 0.1 percent for<br />

those ages 60 <strong>to</strong> 64. In fact, for <strong>the</strong> 53 percent <strong>of</strong> eligible beneficiaries who are over age 50,<br />

<strong>the</strong> participation rate is only 0.3 percent. As a result, while only 22 percent <strong>of</strong> eligible<br />

beneficiaries are under age 40, 45 percent <strong>of</strong> TTW participants fall in that age group.<br />

IV: Early Participation Patterns

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!