13.04.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B.2<br />

After a client has become employed, he or she must print out a one-page Payment<br />

Request form and mail it <strong>to</strong> TakeCharge, along with <strong>the</strong> necessary earnings documentation,<br />

<strong>to</strong> start <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ticket</strong> payment process. As noted previously, TakeCharge pays clients 75<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ticket</strong> payments it receives from SSA. This amounts <strong>to</strong> approximately $245<br />

per month for SSDI beneficiaries and $150 per month for SSI-only recipients. The client will<br />

receive <strong>the</strong> payment after TakeCharge is paid by SSA. TakeCharge selected <strong>the</strong> outcome<br />

payment system, primarily because it was more straightforward than <strong>the</strong> outcome-miles<strong>to</strong>ne<br />

method. The interviewee believed it would be easier for <strong>Ticket</strong> clients <strong>to</strong> understand <strong>the</strong><br />

outcome payment system and <strong>the</strong> resulting payments <strong>the</strong>y would receive as clients <strong>of</strong><br />

TakeCharge.<br />

The interviewee noted that she has a patent pending for her model <strong>of</strong> web-based service<br />

delivery and cash payments <strong>to</strong> clients under TTW. She believes it <strong>to</strong> be a very simple idea,<br />

which will only succeed if administrative costs are kept at a minimum. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> burden <strong>of</strong><br />

program administration is placed on <strong>the</strong> beneficiary. She described her development and<br />

involvement in TakeCharge as more <strong>of</strong> an interesting hobby than a business. In addition <strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> President and owner, TakeCharge has two o<strong>the</strong>r part-time staff persons, both family<br />

members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> President.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> initial interview, TakeCharge had not had any interactions with state VR<br />

agencies. Several months subsequent <strong>to</strong> initial interview (in Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2002), TakeCharge<br />

began <strong>to</strong> negotiate agreements with state VR agencies.<br />

b. Early Experiences Implementing TTW<br />

Beneficiary Outreach and Enrollment. At initial interview, TakeCharge did not<br />

conduct marketing or outreach. All <strong>Ticket</strong> clients were based on referrals from <strong>the</strong><br />

PROGRAM MANAGER website or mailings. Staff interacted with clients entirely through<br />

<strong>the</strong> EN’s website and email. TakeCharge operated an 800 number that provided a twominute<br />

recorded explanation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program, but directed callers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> website. The website<br />

(www.aaatakecharge.com) described <strong>the</strong> services and conditions for participation. Potential<br />

clients had <strong>to</strong> print out <strong>the</strong> application/ Individual <strong>Work</strong> Plan form, complete it, and return<br />

it via mail <strong>to</strong> TakeCharge. Staff did not screen clients; instead, <strong>the</strong> website contained<br />

information for potential clients <strong>to</strong> assess for <strong>the</strong>mselves whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> services <strong>of</strong><br />

TakeCharge would be appropriate for <strong>the</strong>m, and <strong>to</strong> discourage those for whom TakeCharge<br />

might be inappropriate. For example, <strong>the</strong> website noted that beneficiaries should sign up<br />

with TakeCharge if <strong>the</strong>y intended <strong>to</strong> become financially independent <strong>of</strong> Social Security<br />

disability payments and believed <strong>the</strong>y could find work on <strong>the</strong>ir own; or if <strong>the</strong>y were already<br />

working, but were not yet making enough money-- or making it for a long enough period <strong>of</strong><br />

time—<strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>the</strong>ir SSA cash benefits. If <strong>the</strong>y intended <strong>to</strong> continue working or <strong>to</strong> increase<br />

earnings <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> point where monthly SSA cash payments would s<strong>to</strong>p, <strong>the</strong>y were encouraged<br />

<strong>to</strong> sign with TakeCharge.<br />

The website also suggested that if beneficiaries needed assistance getting a job,<br />

completing a college degree, or obtaining adaptive equipment, <strong>the</strong>y should contact <strong>the</strong> state<br />

Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agency and/or o<strong>the</strong>r ENs in <strong>the</strong>ir local areas. The website<br />

Appendix B: Provider-Specific Case Study Summaries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!