Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

More documents

Recommendations

Info

124 Second, analyses of the beneficiaries identified with the preliminary definitions indicate some important differences between AOI group 1 (those who require ongoing supports), AOI group 2 (those who require high-cost accommodations), and all other beneficiaries (Table VI.1). For example, beneficiaries in AOI group 2 are more likely than those in group 1 or in neither of the these two AOI groups to be receiving only DI benefits and less likely to be receiving only SSI benefits. Beneficiaries in AOI group 2 are also more likely to be males than those in AOI group 1 or in neither of these AOI groups (which are essentially equally divided between men and women). The age distributions of the three analytic groups are generally similar, although members of AOI group 1 are somewhat younger. Both AOI groups were similar to non–AOI beneficiaries in terms of the very small percentage that have requested communications from SSA to be provided in any language other than English. Table VI.1: Characteristics of AOI and Other Beneficiaries (Percent) Eligible Beneficiaries in Phase 1 and 2 States Characteristic AOI Group 1 AOI Group 2 All Other Disability Program Title II (DI) Only 55 68 60 Concurrent 13 9 10 Title XVI (SSI) Only 32 23 30 Sex Female 50 42 51 Male 50 58 49 Age 18-24 6 5 2 25-29 5 4 3 30-34 6 5 4 35-39 9 7 7 40-44 12 10 10 45-49 14 12 13 50-54 15 16 16 55-59 16 20 21 60-64 16 22 24 Language Requested for SSA Communications English 97 98 97 Spanish 3 2 3 Other 0 0 0 Number of Beneficiaries in the Analysis 2,729,000 387,000 1,968,000 NOTE: Data from the end of August 2003 C. RELATIVE TTW EXPERIENCES OF AOI GROUPS Not only do beneficiaries included in our preliminary classification of AOI groups 1 and 2 account for a majority of eligible beneficiaries, they also account for the majority of Ticket users. In addition, it appears that they have higher TTW participation rates than do other VI: Adequacy of Incentives Study
eneficiaries. In examining results for Phase 1 states only, where beneficiaries have had the most time to use their Ticket, we find that of the approximately 19,600 beneficiaries using Tickets, 71 percent were in an AOI group; 57 percent in AOI group 1 and 14 percent in AOI group 2 (Figure VI.2). 125 Figure VI.2: Distribution of Assigned Tickets for AOI Groups in Phase 1 States, August 2003 All Others 29% AOI Group 2 (Need Accommodations) 14% AOI Group 1 (Need Ongoing Support) 57% We also observed above average participation rates for both of these AOI groups (Table VI.2). Eligible beneficiaries we classified into AOI group 1 participated at a rate just above the average for all beneficiaries ((0.78 percent compared with 0.74 percent overall), while eligible beneficiaries in AOI group 2 participated at a rate almost twice as high (1.4 percent compared with 0.74 percent). We also computed the participation rate looking just at assignments to providers using one of the two new payment systems, milestone-outcome and outcome-only. Those figures suggest that beneficiaries we classified into the AOI groups participated in the new payment systems at a rate that was very low, but still greater than the rate at which other non-AOI beneficiaries participated. The high participation rate runs counter to expectations about AOI beneficiaries who were predicted to have a difficult time locating an EN to accept their Tickets. In part, this result reflects our preliminary AOI classification system, which uses only information on disabling conditions and so cannot capture individual differences in work history, functional status, and available work supports. The evaluation will investigate this issue more thoroughly as we obtain more detailed administrative and survey data. The result may also reflect the fact that our AOI groups contain many beneficiaries, particularly those with mental illness, mental retardation, several visual impairments, and severe hearing impairments, for whom there are relatively strong advocacy and service systems designed to foster employment. Thus, these beneficiaries may find it easier to learn about the TTW program and participate than beneficiaries for whom there are less well developed support systems (for example, those with low back impairments). VI: Adequacy of Incentives Study
Page 1 and 2:
Contract No.: 0600-03-60130 MPR Ref
Page 3 and 4:
A CKNOWLEDGMENTS This report benefi
Page 5 and 6:
C ONTENTS Chapter Page ACRONYMS ...
Page 7 and 8:
vii Chapter Page V (continued) D. C
Page 9 and 10:
A CRONYMS ABIL AIDS AWICs AOI BPAO
Page 11 and 12:
E XECUTIVE S UMMARY T he Ticket to
Page 13 and 14:
Overall, we found that SSA has impl
Page 15 and 16:
money on their TTW operations. For
Page 17 and 18:
xvii CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS SSA fa
Page 19 and 20:
C HAPTER I O VERVIEW OF THE T ICKET
Page 21 and 22:
The TTW program and other elements
Page 23 and 24:
A. EVALUATION COMPONENTS: GOALS, SC
Page 25 and 26:
7 ! How many beneficiaries particip
Page 27 and 28:
9 B. PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF TH
Page 29 and 30:
C HAPTER II S TRUCTURE AND B ACKGRO
Page 31 and 32:
In reality, however, the success of
Page 33 and 34:
MAXIMUS to serve as the Program Man
Page 35 and 36:
17 4. Participate in the activities
Page 37 and 38:
N Decision Reversed Request SSA Rev
Page 39 and 40:
21 c. Dispute Resolution In a progr
Page 41 and 42:
Table II.1: Outcome-Only and Milest
Page 43 and 44:
milestone payment is equal to 34 pe
Page 45 and 46:
Unemployment Insurance (UI) wage da
Page 47 and 48:
29 3. Related Initiatives TTW has n
Page 49 and 50:
SSA Demonstrations. SSA plans to im
Page 51 and 52:
Protection and Advocacy. The SSA-fu
Page 53 and 54:
C HAPTER III TTW EARLY I MPLEMENTAT
Page 55 and 56:
37 Table III.1: TTW Implementation
Page 57 and 58:
Ticket-eligible beneficiaries were
Page 59 and 60:
41 TTW. In the past, SSA systems ha
Page 61 and 62:
information in SSA’s records cont
Page 63 and 64:
work period automation and tracking
Page 65 and 66:
Systems and Infrastructure. The Pro
Page 67 and 68:
49 asked the Program Manager for a
Page 69 and 70:
51 • The first payment for each b
Page 71 and 72:
currently being addressed relate to
Page 73 and 74:
payment system. Only one SVRA (Okla
Page 75 and 76:
SVRA personnel have consistently ex
Page 77 and 78:
59 • Are SVRAs permitted to requi
Page 79 and 80:
Table III.4: ENs and ENs with Ticke
Page 81 and 82:
Payment System. Many ENs do not bel
Page 83 and 84:
example, reporting lags inherent in
Page 85 and 86:
eceived only small amounts thus far
Page 87 and 88:
SVRA services for Ticket clients; (
Page 89 and 90:
C HAPTER IV E ARLY P ARTICIPATION P
Page 91 and 92: 73 Figure IV.2: Cumulative Number o
Page 93 and 94: point in the Phase 1 rollout. For P
Page 95 and 96: 77 Figure IV.7: First Assignments a
Page 97 and 98: 79 Figure IV.8: Ticket Participatio
Page 99 and 100: 81 Figure IV.10: Ticket Participati
Page 101 and 102: 83 states. This finding suggests th
Page 103 and 104: There is a strong negative relation
Page 105 and 106: C HAPTER V C ASE S TUDIES OF E IGHT
Page 107 and 108: 89 A. SERVICE MODELS AND TARGETED C
Page 109 and 110: Although the director was initially
Page 111 and 112: Clients who assign their Tickets to
Page 113 and 114: session. Those who miss their appoi
Page 115 and 116: interview. While this is time consu
Page 117 and 118: claim employer tax credits. Through
Page 119 and 120: these individuals, because they typ
Page 121 and 122: 103 F. RELATIONS WITH OTHER ORGANIZ
Page 123 and 124: eneficiaries to meet that standard.
Page 125 and 126: IDR representatives said that to da
Page 127 and 128: substantiate wages, and clients are
Page 129 and 130: services? Unfortunately, for ENs to
Page 131 and 132: Manager. At present, this is only p
Page 133 and 134: stubs: the need for beneficiaries t
Page 135 and 136: C HAPTER VI A DEQUACY OF I NCENTIVE
Page 137 and 138: We have also begun to analyze admin
Page 139 and 140: viewed as lacking the productive ca
Page 141: assist in the identification of ind
Page 145 and 146: 127 E. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS The
Page 147 and 148: C HAPTER VII C ONCLUSIONS AND I MPL
Page 149 and 150: noticeably low, and, among the very
Page 151 and 152: Act. At the same time, some ENs hav
Page 153 and 154: Another change requiring considerat
Page 155 and 156: C HAPTER VIII N EXT S TEPS FOR THE
Page 157 and 158: prior to September 2003 and had not
Page 159 and 160: R EFERENCES Adequacy of Incentives
Page 161 and 162: A PPENDIX A D ATA T ABLES C ORRESPO
Page 163 and 164: A-3 Table A.2 Cumulative Number of
Page 165 and 166: A-5 Table A.4 Percentage of Tickets
Page 167 and 168: A-7 Table A.6 Percentage of Tickets
Page 169 and 170: A-9 TABLES SHOWING CHARACTERISTICS
Page 171 and 172: A-11 Table A.10 Ticket Participatio
Page 173 and 174: A-13 Table A.12 Ticket Participatio
Page 175 and 176: A-15 Table A.14 Percentage of In-Us
Page 177 and 178: A PPENDIX B P ROVIDER-SPECIFIC C AS
Page 179 and 180: informed beneficiaries that state V
Page 181 and 182: e considerably more successful if S
Page 183 and 184: them for employment. It was during
Page 185 and 186: working but are still receiving SSI
Page 187 and 188: B.11 client over a four-year period
Page 189 and 190: B.13 placing SSA beneficiaries than
Page 191 and 192: B.15 that came in for an initial ap
Page 193 and 194:
B.17 all benefits; therefore, EES d
Page 195 and 196:
B.19 outreach program. As noted pre
Page 197 and 198:
B.21 remained employed. 3 Because o
Page 199 and 200:
B.23 estimate of the financial loss
Page 201 and 202:
B.25 Social Security benefits. IDR
Page 203 and 204:
B.27 have to submit pay stubs twice
Page 205 and 206:
B.29 Bridges still provides the 10-
Page 207 and 208:
B.31 While she used to have a polic
Page 209 and 210:
B.33 8. Oklahoma Department of Reha
Page 211 and 212:
B.35 Beneficiaries interested in as
Page 213 and 214:
B.37 permits agency budgets to be c
Page 215 and 216:
A PPENDIX C D EFINING THE F OUR A D
Page 217 and 218:
B. IDENTIFYING INDIVIDUALS WITH A N
Page 219:
“work and receive full cash benef
show all

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?