13.04.2014 Views

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

Evaluation of the Ticket to Work Program Initial Evaluation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The TTW program and o<strong>the</strong>r elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ticket</strong> Act try <strong>to</strong> provide <strong>the</strong> means <strong>to</strong><br />

help beneficiaries overcome <strong>the</strong>se barriers. In particular, <strong>the</strong> TTW program introduces a<br />

new financing system for providers and gives beneficiaries a choice over which provider <strong>to</strong><br />

use. The new financing system adds two payment options <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional payment system<br />

that SSA has used in <strong>the</strong> past <strong>to</strong> pay state vocational rehabilitation agencies (SVRAs) for<br />

rehabilitation services provided <strong>to</strong> beneficiaries. The traditional system reimburses an<br />

agency’s costs, up <strong>to</strong> a limit, if a beneficiary obtains earnings <strong>of</strong> at least <strong>the</strong> substantial gainful<br />

activity level (currently set at $810 per month for most individuals) for nine months. The<br />

new options have substantially stronger performance incentives because <strong>the</strong>y require a<br />

beneficiary <strong>to</strong> exit cash benefit status by reason <strong>of</strong> increased earnings for 60 months before<br />

<strong>the</strong> provider receives full payment. The first new option, <strong>the</strong> outcome-only payment system,<br />

provides higher payments but makes no payments until a beneficiary leaves <strong>the</strong> rolls. The<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r new option, <strong>the</strong> miles<strong>to</strong>ne-outcome system, provides smaller outcome payments, but<br />

can provide up <strong>to</strong> four larger miles<strong>to</strong>ne payments while a beneficiary is still receiving<br />

benefits, if a beneficiary achieves intermediate earnings targets.<br />

TTW increases choice by greatly expanding <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> organizations that it will pay <strong>to</strong><br />

assist beneficiaries’ work efforts. Beneficiaries can choose between a range <strong>of</strong> public and<br />

private providers o<strong>the</strong>r than SVRAs, called Employment Networks (ENs), that have signed<br />

a contract with SSA. ENs cannot use <strong>the</strong> traditional payment system, <strong>the</strong>y must elect <strong>to</strong> be<br />

paid under ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> outcome-only or miles<strong>to</strong>ne-outcomes payment systems. SVRAs can<br />

act as ENs by using <strong>the</strong> new payment systems, but <strong>the</strong>y can also decide <strong>to</strong> serve beneficiaries<br />

under <strong>the</strong> traditional system.<br />

In addition, TTW gives service providers and beneficiaries considerable flexibility <strong>to</strong><br />

choose <strong>the</strong> services that will be provided. In fact, providers and beneficiaries must agree on<br />

an individualized employment plan before a ticket can be put in<strong>to</strong> use. This plan could, in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory, include a wide array <strong>of</strong> services designed <strong>to</strong> help beneficiaries overcome barriers<br />

related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> system and labor market, <strong>the</strong>ir employment-related skills,<br />

and even employer misperceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir abilities.<br />

Service delivery is constrained, however, by providers’ desire <strong>to</strong> limit service<br />

expenditures <strong>to</strong> a level that fits within <strong>the</strong> payments <strong>the</strong>y expect <strong>to</strong> receive and by providers’<br />

assessments <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> services <strong>the</strong>y can provide are likely <strong>to</strong> result in a beneficiary<br />

leaving <strong>the</strong> rolls. Participation in TTW is completely voluntary for beneficiaries and<br />

providers, so providers can refuse <strong>to</strong> serve beneficiaries whom <strong>the</strong>y think have a low<br />

probability <strong>of</strong> leaving <strong>the</strong> rolls due <strong>to</strong> work (<strong>the</strong>reby triggering outcome payments).<br />

The TTW legislation also introduces o<strong>the</strong>r changes that try <strong>to</strong> reduce <strong>the</strong> policy barriers<br />

that can make work unattractive <strong>to</strong> some beneficiaries. In particular, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ticket</strong> Act<br />

contained <strong>the</strong> following provisions: 1<br />

3<br />

1 O<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> suspension <strong>of</strong> medical disability reviews, <strong>the</strong>se provisions are available<br />

<strong>to</strong> beneficiaries regardless <strong>of</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are using a <strong>Ticket</strong>.<br />

I: Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Ticket</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Work</strong> <strong>Program</strong> and Its <strong>Evaluation</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!