31.10.2012 Views

Hungarian and Eskimo-Aleut

Hungarian and Eskimo-Aleut

Hungarian and Eskimo-Aleut

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ALFRÉD TÓTH : HUNGARIAN AND ESKIMO-ALEUT — with Paleo-Siberian Cognates<br />

3. Conclusions<br />

Almost all of the 1317 Sumerian-Akkadian-Rhaetic etymologies of <strong>Hungarian</strong> also apply to the<br />

<strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> <strong>and</strong> Paleo-Siberian cognates. Moreover, it was possible to add a few dozens more<br />

Sumerian-<strong>Hungarian</strong>-<strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> etymologies, totally 1080. This proves without doubt that the<br />

<strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> languages are – speaking in the traditional manner of Finno-Ugrists – members of the<br />

Finno-Ugric, but not of the Uralic languages, since the Paleo-Siberian languages seem to be much<br />

closer to the Samoyed languages than to the Finno-Ugric languages. <strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> is closer to<br />

<strong>Hungarian</strong> than Yupik <strong>and</strong> the other related languages. Only a systematic analysis of the possible<br />

Sumerian-Obugrian cognates could decide if the <strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> languages are closer to <strong>Hungarian</strong> or to<br />

Ostyak <strong>and</strong> Vogul, but everything points to a closer relationship between <strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hungarian</strong>.<br />

In many dozens of cases new etymologies <strong>and</strong> corrections of the st<strong>and</strong>ard Proto-Finno-Ugric <strong>and</strong><br />

Proto-Uralic forms were possible, because the Proto-<strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> <strong>and</strong> Proto-Yupik forms st<strong>and</strong> in the<br />

time-frame between Sumerian <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hungarian</strong>. Because the dissolution of Uralo-Siberian <strong>and</strong> Uralo-<br />

Yukagir coincides in time approximately with the dissolution of the Uralic languages (6000-4000 B.C.,<br />

cf. Fortescue 1998, p. 219 <strong>and</strong> Décsy 1990, p. 12), Proto-<strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> <strong>and</strong> Proto-Yupik forms could<br />

be added instead of Proto-Uralic <strong>and</strong> Proto-Finno-Ugric forms, thus “filling the temportal gap”<br />

between Sumerian <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hungarian</strong>. After our result here one really wonders why traditional Finno-<br />

Ugrists <strong>and</strong> Uralists did not yet come to the idea to consider Proto-<strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong> forms in cases where<br />

f.ex. <strong>Hungarian</strong> words are considered to be “of unknown origin”: the idea to connect <strong>Eskimo</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Hungarian</strong> goes back to 1746!<br />

Of very special interest is the fact that we have cases where Rhaetic words show up directly – i.e. not<br />

mediated via Sumerian or Akkadian – in <strong>Hungarian</strong> <strong>and</strong> in <strong>Eskimo</strong>-<strong>Aleut</strong>. This fact seems to point to a<br />

certain dissolution already amongst the Sumerian peoples.<br />

___________________________________________________________________________________<br />

© Copyright Mikes International 2001-2007, Alfréd Tóth 2007 - 174 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!