12.05.2014 Views

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IBO - <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> Health <strong>related</strong> Criteria <strong>for</strong> Buildings<br />

expert group convened by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC)<br />

promotes <strong>and</strong> seeks consensus between the indoor material labelling schemes. The result<br />

should be a harmonised framework <strong>for</strong> indoor labelling schemes in Europe <strong>and</strong> link them to<br />

legislation: “The intention is to align the harmonised framework across various legislative<br />

m<strong>and</strong>ates, such as, Construction Products Directive (89/106/EEC), Energy Per<strong>for</strong>mance of<br />

Buildings Directive – EPBD (2002/91/EC), EC Lead Market Initiative (COM(2007)860),<br />

Integrated Product Policy (IPP), Chemicals Policy (REACH), Green Public Procurement,<br />

Thematic Strategy on Urban Environment (COM(2004)60), Integration of <strong>Environmental</strong><br />

Aspects into European St<strong>and</strong>ardisation (COM(2004)206), etc.” (ECA-IAQ, 2010)<br />

In ECA-IAG draft report n° 27 (ECA-IAQ, 2010) a first step was taken in direction of a<br />

consensus achieved among the representatives of the Danish (DICL) <strong>and</strong> Finnish (M1)<br />

labelling schemes <strong>and</strong> the German (AgBB) <strong>and</strong> French (AFSSET) evaluation systems. This<br />

framework envisions<br />

- common core <strong>criteria</strong> on testing <strong>and</strong> evaluation methodologies to be accepted by<br />

consensus <strong>and</strong><br />

- optional <strong>criteria</strong> to be applied locally <strong>for</strong> those substances/factors <strong>for</strong> which no consensus<br />

exists yet.<br />

The <strong>criteria</strong> were suggested taking into consideration the results of round robin testing of<br />

products. This round robin testing was per<strong>for</strong>med according to the individual schemes <strong>and</strong><br />

the on-going work within the European st<strong>and</strong>ardisation body (CEN/TC 351).<br />

The main findings in ECA-EAQ draft report n°27 are:<br />

- Until harmonised st<strong>and</strong>ards become available, ISO 16000-series st<strong>and</strong>ards should be<br />

used <strong>for</strong> measurement with two exceptions:<br />

- A reference room size has already been proposed <strong>and</strong> shall be used instead of the<br />

ISO 16000-9 in<strong>for</strong>mative annex B.<br />

- Emission testing should include two chamber air sampling times (day 3 <strong>and</strong> 28)<br />

- The evaluation <strong>criteria</strong> should cover all contaminants of concern to <strong>health</strong> <strong>and</strong> com<strong>for</strong>t<br />

<strong>and</strong> be based on scientific evidence when available.<br />

- TVOC should not be used alone as an indicator <strong>for</strong> evaluating <strong>health</strong> effects from indoor<br />

material emissions. A common approach <strong>for</strong> TVOC definition along with an upper limit <strong>for</strong><br />

TVOC should be established.<br />

- If volatile compounds classified as EU carcinogens are detected after 3 days, the test can<br />

be stopped.<br />

- The LCI-approach is currently the most feasible strategy beyond the evaluated schemes<br />

to assess the <strong>health</strong> effects of compounds from <strong>buildings</strong> materials. An expert group<br />

should be initiated to propose common European LCI-<strong>criteria</strong>. Criteria should be set also<br />

<strong>for</strong> substances not having LCI values (i.e., “non-assessable” substances).<br />

- Sensory evaluation is considered to be an important part in the assessment of material<br />

emissions.<br />

Table 30 gives an overview about the consensus reached <strong>for</strong> the measurement methods, the<br />

core <strong>and</strong> the optional <strong>criteria</strong> (ECA-EAQ, 2010).<br />

Final Report 149 31 03 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!