Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC
Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC
Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IBO - <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> Health <strong>related</strong> Criteria <strong>for</strong> Buildings<br />
expert group convened by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC)<br />
promotes <strong>and</strong> seeks consensus between the indoor material labelling schemes. The result<br />
should be a harmonised framework <strong>for</strong> indoor labelling schemes in Europe <strong>and</strong> link them to<br />
legislation: “The intention is to align the harmonised framework across various legislative<br />
m<strong>and</strong>ates, such as, Construction Products Directive (89/106/EEC), Energy Per<strong>for</strong>mance of<br />
Buildings Directive – EPBD (2002/91/EC), EC Lead Market Initiative (COM(2007)860),<br />
Integrated Product Policy (IPP), Chemicals Policy (REACH), Green Public Procurement,<br />
Thematic Strategy on Urban Environment (COM(2004)60), Integration of <strong>Environmental</strong><br />
Aspects into European St<strong>and</strong>ardisation (COM(2004)206), etc.” (ECA-IAQ, 2010)<br />
In ECA-IAG draft report n° 27 (ECA-IAQ, 2010) a first step was taken in direction of a<br />
consensus achieved among the representatives of the Danish (DICL) <strong>and</strong> Finnish (M1)<br />
labelling schemes <strong>and</strong> the German (AgBB) <strong>and</strong> French (AFSSET) evaluation systems. This<br />
framework envisions<br />
- common core <strong>criteria</strong> on testing <strong>and</strong> evaluation methodologies to be accepted by<br />
consensus <strong>and</strong><br />
- optional <strong>criteria</strong> to be applied locally <strong>for</strong> those substances/factors <strong>for</strong> which no consensus<br />
exists yet.<br />
The <strong>criteria</strong> were suggested taking into consideration the results of round robin testing of<br />
products. This round robin testing was per<strong>for</strong>med according to the individual schemes <strong>and</strong><br />
the on-going work within the European st<strong>and</strong>ardisation body (CEN/TC 351).<br />
The main findings in ECA-EAQ draft report n°27 are:<br />
- Until harmonised st<strong>and</strong>ards become available, ISO 16000-series st<strong>and</strong>ards should be<br />
used <strong>for</strong> measurement with two exceptions:<br />
- A reference room size has already been proposed <strong>and</strong> shall be used instead of the<br />
ISO 16000-9 in<strong>for</strong>mative annex B.<br />
- Emission testing should include two chamber air sampling times (day 3 <strong>and</strong> 28)<br />
- The evaluation <strong>criteria</strong> should cover all contaminants of concern to <strong>health</strong> <strong>and</strong> com<strong>for</strong>t<br />
<strong>and</strong> be based on scientific evidence when available.<br />
- TVOC should not be used alone as an indicator <strong>for</strong> evaluating <strong>health</strong> effects from indoor<br />
material emissions. A common approach <strong>for</strong> TVOC definition along with an upper limit <strong>for</strong><br />
TVOC should be established.<br />
- If volatile compounds classified as EU carcinogens are detected after 3 days, the test can<br />
be stopped.<br />
- The LCI-approach is currently the most feasible strategy beyond the evaluated schemes<br />
to assess the <strong>health</strong> effects of compounds from <strong>buildings</strong> materials. An expert group<br />
should be initiated to propose common European LCI-<strong>criteria</strong>. Criteria should be set also<br />
<strong>for</strong> substances not having LCI values (i.e., “non-assessable” substances).<br />
- Sensory evaluation is considered to be an important part in the assessment of material<br />
emissions.<br />
Table 30 gives an overview about the consensus reached <strong>for</strong> the measurement methods, the<br />
core <strong>and</strong> the optional <strong>criteria</strong> (ECA-EAQ, 2010).<br />
Final Report 149 31 03 2011