12.05.2014 Views

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IBO - <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> Health <strong>related</strong> Criteria <strong>for</strong> Buildings<br />

home owners or tenants should at least be in<strong>for</strong>med about the savings potential through<br />

energy-efficient domestic appliances (e.g. via energylabel, user guides, web links etc.).<br />

c) Primary energy dem<strong>and</strong> (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

Delivered energy is an appropriate in<strong>for</strong>mative parameter <strong>for</strong> consumers but not sufficient as<br />

ecological key indicator <strong>for</strong> the whole energy consumption of the building sector. Important<br />

relevant energy generation processes are excluded from consideration. Energy scarcity <strong>and</strong><br />

the upstream processes to generate energy delivered to the final consumer cannot be<br />

neglected. There<strong>for</strong>e, it is necessary to include primary energy into a comprehensive building<br />

assessment method. Additionally, the authors recommend to rate renewable <strong>and</strong> nonrenewable<br />

energy consumption separately, since availability <strong>and</strong> renewability of resources is<br />

an important ecological aspect. This can be done by rating the primary energy dem<strong>and</strong> of<br />

non-renewable resources or by assessing both the total primary energy dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />

share of renewable resources.<br />

Primary energy factors <strong>for</strong> different energy carriers (especially electricity <strong>and</strong> district heating)<br />

must be consistent <strong>and</strong> based on the same datasource when assessing <strong>buildings</strong> within one<br />

rating system. Ranges of production mix (e.g. >70%, > 50%, >35% Combined Heat <strong>and</strong><br />

Power) have to be specified.<br />

The highest level to achieve (zero energy/plus energy <strong>buildings</strong>) need clear distinction <strong>and</strong> a<br />

stringent definition of the balance boundaries (whether zero energy level will be achieved<br />

within a period of one year or at any time <strong>and</strong> renewable energy sources on-site/off-site are<br />

taken into account).<br />

d) CO 2 Emissions (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

Apart from causing emissions of pollutants such as SOx, NOx <strong>and</strong> particulate matter, energy<br />

generation <strong>and</strong> supply is one of the main sources of carbon-dioxide emissions thus<br />

contributing to man-induced greenhouse effect. Apart from industry production processes<br />

<strong>and</strong> transport, <strong>buildings</strong> are the main consumers of energy.<br />

CO 2 based assessments of <strong>buildings</strong> will be inevitable in future taking into consideration the<br />

European environmental policy.<br />

Not all member states have already implemented a CO 2 calculation method.<br />

In this case the primary energy dem<strong>and</strong> is acceptable as key indicator in order not to cause<br />

extra calculation expense. Where CO 2 indicators are already implemented it is recommended<br />

to add a rating <strong>for</strong> the CO 2 emissions <strong>for</strong> assessing the efficiency of climate protection<br />

measures in the building sector. 5<br />

e) NO x emissions, Particulate Matter (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

Minimum requirements <strong>for</strong> the NO x <strong>and</strong> Particulate Matter emissions of the heating systems<br />

in regular operation shall be given in an EU-wide Eco-label <strong>for</strong> <strong>buildings</strong>.<br />

5 Advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages of using CO 2 as key indicator <strong>for</strong> product rating (e.g. Product Carbon Footprint)<br />

are broadly discussed in the study ”Quack, D.; Grießhammer, R.; Teufel, J.; Requirements on Consumer<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation about Product Carbon Footprint (ed. Öko-Institut e.V. commissioned by <strong>ANEC</strong>, Freiburg, 2010)”<br />

Final Report 7 31 03 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!