12.05.2014 Views

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IBO - <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> Health <strong>related</strong> Criteria <strong>for</strong> Buildings<br />

Primary energy factors <strong>for</strong> different energy carriers (especially electricity <strong>and</strong> district heating<br />

with defined levels of production mix, e.g. >70%, > 50%, >35% Combined Heat <strong>and</strong> Power)<br />

must be consistent <strong>and</strong> based on the same datasource when assessing <strong>buildings</strong> within one<br />

rating system.<br />

The highest level to achieve (zero energy/plus energy <strong>buildings</strong>) need clear distinction <strong>and</strong> a<br />

stringent definition of the balance boundaries (whether zero energy level will be achieved<br />

within a period of one year or at any time <strong>and</strong> renewable energy sources on-site/off-site are<br />

taken into account).<br />

d) CO 2 Emissions (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

Apart from causing emissions of pollutants such as SOx, NOx <strong>and</strong> particulate matter, energy<br />

generation <strong>and</strong> supply is one of the main sources of carbon-dioxide emissions thus<br />

contributing to man-induced greenhouse effect. Apart from industry production processes<br />

<strong>and</strong> transport, <strong>buildings</strong> are the main consumers of energy.<br />

CO 2 based assessments of <strong>buildings</strong> will be inevitable in future taking into consideration the<br />

European environmental policy.<br />

Not all member states have already implemented a CO 2 calculation method.<br />

In this case the primary energy dem<strong>and</strong> is acceptable as key indicator in order not to cause<br />

extra calculation expense. Where CO 2 indicators are already implemented it is recommended<br />

to add a rating <strong>for</strong> the CO 2 emissions <strong>for</strong> assessing the efficiency of climate protection<br />

measures in the building sector. 53<br />

e) NO x emissions, Particulate Matter (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

Minimum requirements <strong>for</strong> the NO x <strong>and</strong> Particulate Matter emissions of the heating systems<br />

in regular operation shall be given in an EU-wide Eco-label <strong>for</strong> <strong>buildings</strong>.<br />

Embodied Energy in Building Materials<br />

The embodied energy in building materials shall be considered as a proxy indicator to assess<br />

the environmental per<strong>for</strong>mance of the building. For more details to lifecycle considerations<br />

see the following chapter “Life cycle assessment”.<br />

Traffic-<strong>related</strong> Energy Consumption<br />

53 Advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages of using CO 2 as key indicator <strong>for</strong> product rating (e.g. Product Carbon Footprint)<br />

are broadly discussed in the study ”Quack, D.; Grießhammer, R.; Teufel, J.; Requirements on Consumer<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation about Product Carbon Footprint (ed. Öko-Institut e.V. commissioned by <strong>ANEC</strong>, Freiburg, 2010)”<br />

Final Report 81 31 03 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!