Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC
Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC
Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IBO - <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> Health <strong>related</strong> Criteria <strong>for</strong> Buildings<br />
Building assessment systems may use similar indicators but conceptually h<strong>and</strong>le them<br />
differently. These different approaches should be described with their advantages <strong>and</strong><br />
disadvantages <strong>and</strong> conclusions drawn about which concept would be useful <strong>for</strong> consumers.<br />
Next step was the choice of indicators that had to be exemplified. It led to the following<br />
categories <strong>for</strong> which an in-depth analysis was carried out:<br />
- Life cycle assessment (LCA) with focus on building material<br />
- Energy dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> CO 2 -emissions with focus on operation phase<br />
- Daylighting<br />
- Emissions on construction site<br />
- Chemicals in building materials / indoor air<br />
2.2. Energy <strong>and</strong> CO 2 Emissions<br />
Operation phase<br />
Highly aggregated results such as CO 2 emissions or primary energy dem<strong>and</strong> – especially<br />
when summarized over the whole life cycle may lead to losses of important interim results<br />
<strong>and</strong> optimisation steps which are more relevant to target groups of building rating systems.<br />
End-consumers <strong>for</strong> example need comprehensible <strong>and</strong> sufficiently accurate in<strong>for</strong>mation of<br />
the energy efficiency of both, building envelope <strong>and</strong> HVAC systems, <strong>and</strong> guidance which<br />
energy carriers are environmentally-friendly, secure <strong>and</strong> available at af<strong>for</strong>dable costs.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, the following bottom-up approach is recommended:<br />
a) Heating or – if more applicable <strong>for</strong> southern latitudes – cooling <strong>and</strong> heating energy<br />
dem<strong>and</strong> (assessment of the building envelope, solar passive gains <strong>and</strong> passive<br />
cooling measures)<br />
b) Delivered energy (assessment of the energy-efficiency of both envelope <strong>and</strong> HVAC<br />
systems)<br />
c) Primary energy (restricted to the operational phase)<br />
d) CO 2 Emissions (restricted to the operational phase)<br />
e) NO x Emissions, Particulate Matter (restricted to the operational phase)<br />
a) Heating or – if more applicable <strong>for</strong> southern latitudes – cooling <strong>and</strong> heating energy<br />
dem<strong>and</strong><br />
Apart from local climate conditions, heating energy dem<strong>and</strong> is influenced by parameters that<br />
describe the thermal specifications of a building: average U-value, compactness, airtightness<br />
of the building, avoidance of thermal bridges, ventilation losses, <strong>and</strong> passive solar<br />
gains, cooling energy dem<strong>and</strong> by size of windows <strong>and</strong> passive cooling measures (like<br />
shading devices, thermal capacity of the building mass, night venting, etc.).<br />
Final Report 5 31 03 2011