12.05.2014 Views

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

Environmental and health related criteria for buildings - ANEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IBO - <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>and</strong> Health <strong>related</strong> Criteria <strong>for</strong> Buildings<br />

Building assessment systems may use similar indicators but conceptually h<strong>and</strong>le them<br />

differently. These different approaches should be described with their advantages <strong>and</strong><br />

disadvantages <strong>and</strong> conclusions drawn about which concept would be useful <strong>for</strong> consumers.<br />

Next step was the choice of indicators that had to be exemplified. It led to the following<br />

categories <strong>for</strong> which an in-depth analysis was carried out:<br />

- Life cycle assessment (LCA) with focus on building material<br />

- Energy dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> CO 2 -emissions with focus on operation phase<br />

- Daylighting<br />

- Emissions on construction site<br />

- Chemicals in building materials / indoor air<br />

2.2. Energy <strong>and</strong> CO 2 Emissions<br />

Operation phase<br />

Highly aggregated results such as CO 2 emissions or primary energy dem<strong>and</strong> – especially<br />

when summarized over the whole life cycle may lead to losses of important interim results<br />

<strong>and</strong> optimisation steps which are more relevant to target groups of building rating systems.<br />

End-consumers <strong>for</strong> example need comprehensible <strong>and</strong> sufficiently accurate in<strong>for</strong>mation of<br />

the energy efficiency of both, building envelope <strong>and</strong> HVAC systems, <strong>and</strong> guidance which<br />

energy carriers are environmentally-friendly, secure <strong>and</strong> available at af<strong>for</strong>dable costs.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, the following bottom-up approach is recommended:<br />

a) Heating or – if more applicable <strong>for</strong> southern latitudes – cooling <strong>and</strong> heating energy<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> (assessment of the building envelope, solar passive gains <strong>and</strong> passive<br />

cooling measures)<br />

b) Delivered energy (assessment of the energy-efficiency of both envelope <strong>and</strong> HVAC<br />

systems)<br />

c) Primary energy (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

d) CO 2 Emissions (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

e) NO x Emissions, Particulate Matter (restricted to the operational phase)<br />

a) Heating or – if more applicable <strong>for</strong> southern latitudes – cooling <strong>and</strong> heating energy<br />

dem<strong>and</strong><br />

Apart from local climate conditions, heating energy dem<strong>and</strong> is influenced by parameters that<br />

describe the thermal specifications of a building: average U-value, compactness, airtightness<br />

of the building, avoidance of thermal bridges, ventilation losses, <strong>and</strong> passive solar<br />

gains, cooling energy dem<strong>and</strong> by size of windows <strong>and</strong> passive cooling measures (like<br />

shading devices, thermal capacity of the building mass, night venting, etc.).<br />

Final Report 5 31 03 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!