Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...
Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...
Doing Business in the Netherlands 2012 - American Chamber of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Do<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Bus<strong>in</strong>ess</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands <strong>2012</strong><br />
Applications for Dutch patents must be submitted to <strong>the</strong> Industrial<br />
Property Office (Bureau voor de Industriële Eigendom) <strong>in</strong> Rijswijk,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands. Although <strong>the</strong> description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> patent application<br />
may be filed <strong>in</strong> English, <strong>the</strong> patent claims <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> application have to be<br />
submitted <strong>in</strong> Dutch.<br />
European patent applications can be filed with <strong>the</strong> European Patent<br />
Office <strong>in</strong> Munich, Germany, or with its subdivision <strong>in</strong> Rijswijk, <strong>the</strong><br />
Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands.<br />
Where a prohibited act with respect to a patented <strong>in</strong>vention is<br />
commissioned without permission from <strong>the</strong> patent holder, this will<br />
constitute a patent <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement.<br />
The test for patent <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement boils down to <strong>the</strong> question whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g act (product/process) falls with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>voked Dutch patent. Technically, this means that <strong>the</strong> patent claims<br />
and specifications will need to be analyzed aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g act.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, Dutch courts also tend to apply <strong>the</strong> “equivalence test,”<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>re will also be an <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement <strong>of</strong> a Dutch patent even<br />
if <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g product or process does not fall with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> literal<br />
scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> patent claim(s), but can be considered to be “equivalent”<br />
to <strong>the</strong> claimed <strong>in</strong>vention.<br />
Dutch patent law acknowledges <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction between “direct” and<br />
“<strong>in</strong>direct” <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement. Direct <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gers commit acts which fall<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> patent, for example, by manufactur<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
product for which <strong>the</strong> patent claims protection. Indirect <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> goods which “direct <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gers” use to apply <strong>the</strong><br />
patented <strong>in</strong>vention, for example, <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong> raw materials and<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> draw<strong>in</strong>gs or recipes. In order to be held liable for patent<br />
<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement, <strong>the</strong> “<strong>in</strong>direct <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>ger” should be aware or should have<br />
been aware that <strong>the</strong> goods supplied were <strong>in</strong>tended to be used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g products/process.<br />
Under Dutch patent law, any person or entity engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an<br />
<strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g act can be held liable for patent <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>gement. Potential<br />
Baker & McKenzie 89